JTAG

JTAG is a serial protocol, similar to SPI in some respects, that is used for boundary scan testing, in circuit emulation, and flash programming. It is standardized in IEEE 1149.1-1990. In boundary scan mode, all the I/O pins on all JTAG devices on a board may be connected together in one giant shift register with one or more bits per pin. There are control registers and ways to bypass the shift register for individual devices (replacing them with a one bit register).

The picture above shows a slightly ficticious chip with a simple 8 bit D-flip flop register with clock and output enable controls with a JTAG TAP (Test Access Port) controller and 18 boundary cells, one on each I/O pin, added. The boundary cells are connected together in a big daisy chain loop. I show only the data path in that loop, there are a number of control signals as well. Individual chips are then connected together in a longer loop. I say the chip is ficticious but there are similar parts: TI SN74BCT8374A is almost identical. The amount of test logic on such a simple device far exceeds the amount of operational logic.

JTAG is not an open standard in the sense that internet RFCs and USB are and the way all standards should be, where you can download the standard documents for free. Instead, they fund the standards process by selling copies of the standards documents. It would cost you around $400 to purchase a copy of the standards plus possibly a couple hundred more for books to explain them. This is prohibitively expensive for hobbyists, open source developers, some small businesses, and lots of other people who can't justify forking over that kind of money to buy a standard that they don't know if it will help them until they have read it. Add $100-$400 or so for a USB JTAG pod or cable . And fancy commercial software can cost close to $3000 a copy. There is some free software, with limited functionality, no-frills parallel cables can be had for around $20, and there is almost enough information on the net to do some serious stuff with JTAG, though you can spend weeks finding it. This page will help you in your quest.

A long time ago, I worked for a company specializing in built-in test. I wrote the software that analyzed the reliability of synthetic aperature radar systems, software that determined in what order to perform tests, built in diagnostics software for sonar systems, and the hardware device that actually injected simulated faults into the system. (I did other things, as well: I wrote the billing software, the timecard system, the purchase order system, adminstered the network and the PBX, and reverse engineered the proprietary network stack (including the firmware on the NIC card)) so I could write network utilities. We were among those who pushed for inclusion of boundary scan in ICs and the creation of the JTAG standard in the first place and one of my coworkers was on the standards committee. Unfortunately, I didn't get to work with JTAG at the time because the standard didn't exist and there weren't actually any parts that implemented boundary scan. 25 years later, JTAG is availible on far fewer chips than it should be. It is found on most FPGAs, CPLDs, better microcontrollers and processors, and some peripherals. It still isn't available on gates and most other discrete logic parts; there are a few overpriced registers and bus transceivers with JTAG, similar to the one pictured above. But it is several times cheaper to replace those parts with a CPLD and instead of needing glue logic to drive the logic chip, you can reprogram the CPLD to be compatible with your signals and maybe suck in some extra glue logic as well. Now that some of the programable logic vendors provide free (as in beer) software, small logic parts are mostly obsolete. And to take best advantage of JTAG for testability, you will want to use programable logic and microcontrollers instead of discrete logic. And JTAG is widely used, beyond its original intended purpose, for programming those microcontrollers and programmable logic devices.

What JTAG can do?

Here are things JTAG can do or potentially do:

• Boundary scan test of connections between JTAG compliant ICs and boards.
• Test of logic connected between JTAG devices
• In system programming of flash based FPGAs, CPLDs, and other progammable logic. Parts can also be programmed while installed in a zif socket with a JTAG connector.
• Temporary configuration of ram based FPGAs and other programmable logic
• Loading FPGA or CPLD bitstreams into JTAG enabled serial configuration flash devices (such as Xilinx Platform Flash) used to configure FPGAs on reset.
• Loading code into JTAG enabled parallel flash chips (if you can find one)
• Loading code into FLASH memory devices that are not JTAG enabled by manipulating address, data, and control lines on other JTAG enabled chips (such as a micro or CPLD). This can be very inefficient and slow (possible workarounds listed below).
• In system (or Zif) programming of Microcontrollers.
• Test that internal logic of a chip conforms to specifications, provided you have a model or test vectors.
• Detailed internal chip testing with internal cells inserted to allow breaking the design into smaller, testable pieces.
• On chip debugging (hardware assisted debugger built into micro). Breakpoints, single stepping, memory examine/change, etc.
• Test of external connectors on a board, provided you have JTAG devices to connect it to such as a JTAG based test fixture, other JTAG enabled boards that normally connect to the board, loopback connections, or have connected bidirectional I/Os between two similar boards together.
• De-brick routers, motherboards, etc. after a botched firmware download.
• Communicate with logic or software inside a micro, FPGA, CPLD, or other programable logic provided that the chip provides JTAG accessable data registers.
• Check jumper settings to digital logic to check if board is jumpered to factory configuration before shipping.
• Eliminate jumpers in many applications.
• Production programming and test of assembled boards. You can test the solder connections, download Microcontroller, FPGA, and CPLD firmware, and perform basic (low frequency) testing of board logic. All in a single operation with hookup to one or two jtag connectors. You may also be able to set the real time clock by twiddling SPI or I2C pins.
• Measure supply voltages, if you have a JTAG ADC on board.
• Trim boards, if you can find a JTAG DAC or have a DAC or digital potentiometer driven from programmable logic.
• Design one board to be used for multiple functions reducing design, NRE, and inventory costs and achieving better economy of scale. Board can be personalized just in time for shipment.
• Update or reconfigure systems in the field. You can send a technician with a PDA or LAPTOP, send JTAG pod and software to customer, ship a small inexpensive device with flash memory and a microcontroller that acts as a JTAG player, or design the system to perform self upgrades.
• Build in USB JTAG for easy field upgrades.
• Do built in self test by providing a mechanism for an onboard micro to access the JTAG chain.
• Perform analog tests (limited number of devices support 1149.4, though).
• Re-purpose off the shelf devices to serve new applications the designer may not have even imagined.
• Perform basic RAM tests.
• Software developers may be able to use JTAG to produce a partial netlist sufficient to describe the connectivity information needed for software development.
• JTAG could be used to program nonvolatile "fuses" on IIC bus devices to set the node address, thereby overcoming the achiles heal of IIC.

Limitations

Attempts to use JTAG in the ways described above can be hampered by:

• Standards which aren't free
• Commercial software that is too expensive for many applications and which may be difficult to modify or extend.
• "free" software that is either too limited in function or has a copyleft license that prevents you from owning your own enhancements which may contain sensitive information or substantial value added.
• Limited part availability. Obtuse semiconductor manufacturers often omit JTAG when the marginal cost would be negligable or even negative (due to enhanced testability) or when JTAG might substantially increase part sales and/or allow one part to replace many.
• JTAG pods which lack adequate documentation.
• Software that will only work with PODs supplied by the software vendor.
• For the most part, JTAG can not be used to perform high speed functional testing although it may assist in configuration for such testing by setting mode pins to appropriate states or downloading test code to programmable devices capable of high speed signal generation and checking.
• Many pods are cable of far less than the 20Mbps allowed by the standard which limits certain applications like programming large flash devices via bit twiddling of attached chips.
• Different connectors used on different products.
• Programable logic vendors who don't provide easy ways to reconfigure parts without resynthesis which is needed to trim parts or make minor (software jumper) configuration changes.
• JTAG boundary scan was designed in the days of TTL logic which had asymetric drive. If two pins were shorted together and you drove a 0 on one and a 1 on the other, you would usually get a consistent 0 as a result. With many modern logic families the result is far less predictable. This could be improved with programmable pull-up and pull-down combined with output and I/O cells that can be operated in open drain or tristate mode and/or receivers that have multiple thresholds. A part may even have these features in normal operation but they may not be available via JTAG.
• Components such as pull-up resistors may not be adequately tested.

BSDL

A supplement to 1149.1-1990 defined the boundary scan description language (BSDL). BSDL is a subset of VHDL. IEEE 1532 extended BSDL to have information on flash/FPGA/CPLD programming. Another important improvement in 1532 is list which maps pin numbers to pin names. Note that for many programable logic devices, the BSDL files distributed by the vendor describe the device before configuration but the configuration may change circuitry between the boundary scan registers and the pins. Xilinx has a bsdlanno program to generate a BSDL file for a specific design that describes the device post-configuration. ur Xilinx has no-cost with source software, called J Drive, that reads 1532 files and programs devices. (registration required). Altera's equivalent is JAM

The PIN_MAP_STRING tends to be rather haphazardly split into lines with the string concatenation operator "&"..

BSDL parsers

BSDL was defined in an IEEE supplement and extended in IEEE STD 1532. Kenneth P. Parker and Stig Oresjo at HP (now Agilent) distributed the source to what was probably the original BSDL parser. It can also be found as a listing in an appendix of the Boundary Scan Handbook containing a copy of the paper A language for describing boundary scan devices (1991). The license is a little vague but appears permissive in intent. The language has changed since then. IEEE 1149.1-2001 lists some changes and IEEE 1532 lists some additional changes.

Mentor graphics has published a paper on ABSDL, an analog extension to BSDL for mixed-signal test. Optional package declaration is "use STD_1149-4_version.all" where "version" refers to an updated version of the standard that hasn't been released yet.

HSDL

HSDL is a BSDL derived syntax for defining board level details.

Test Description Language (TDL)

SVF, XSVF, JAM, STAPL

SVF (ascii) and XSVF (binary) are files created by xilinx tools that contain JTAG instructions for how to program a particular device. "player" software source code is available (see links below). They are pretty limited, they let you do SHIFT-IR and SHIFT-DR and specify the data to be transfered and the response to expect and specify fixed bit strings to send and match before and after but they don't let you get creative with other TAP controller states which you might need in a boundary scan application. JAM evolved into STAPL which is a JEDEC standard, available from JEDEC as JESD71 (direct linking not permitted). It is an acronym for Standard Test And Programming Language and is designed for programming and testing devices over JTAG. It also supports devices with human interfaces. It was designed in such a way, though that it is not practical for devices with limited memory. There is also apparently a JEDEC standard transfer format, that isn't very popular.

STV and SRV

STV is an acronym for Sequenctial Test Vector and SRV is an acronym for Sequential Response Vector.

Standards

• IEEE 1149.1 - Digital Boundary scan
• IEEE 1532 - In-System Configuration
• IEEE 1149.6 Advanced I/O testing, AC coupled, differential, etc.
• IEEE Std 1149.4 Analog boundary scan

Links to the actual standard documents can be found in the books section, below.

IEEE STD 1149.4 Analog JTAG

There are extensions to JTAG that allow signals to be routed to and from two analog test pins. The National STA400EP is an analog mux with analog boundary scan built in but it appears it is being discontinued.

The two internal analog buses, AB1 and AB2, are connected by a 2x2 crosspoint switch to the two test pins. AT1 and AT2; switching pins is used for calibration?. Switch impedance is not necessarily low. "4 wire" measurements of an external resistor are done by taking two measurements, one on each side. 30 node limit per internal bus (typical practical limit), can be increased to 900 by two level hierarchy. Parts with incompatable voltage ranges may need a separate bus or perhaps a voltage clamp.

IJTAG

Work is afoot to provide faster TAP access to internal logic by providing a higher speed TAP based on SERDES (such as used by gigabit ethernet, PCI express, SATA, etc.). This is oriented more towards factory test rather than board level test. IEEE P1687.

Topologies

Single Chip

TAP Connector connects directly to the JTAG pins on a single chip. A lot of microcontrollers require this since they also use the TAP for a non-jtag compliant On-Chip debug mode.

Single Scan Chain

Multiple Chips are connected with TDO of one chip driving TDI of the next chip. TAP TDI connects to first chip and TAP TDO connects to last chip. TMS and TCK are connected in parallel to each device.

Separate chain for microcontroller

Another configuration is to have a completely separate chain for a microcontroller. This is because the microcontroller often supports on-chip debug via the JTAG pins but it may use the port in non-standard ways or the software may be confused by other chips on the bus. The microcontroller has a pin that selects whether the TAP port is in JTAG mode or OCD mode.

Multiple chips with separate TDI and TDO

TAP port has separate TDI and TDO pins for each chip but TMS and TCK are shared. Allows faster access to each chip.

Multiple scan chains sharing TMS and TCK

Similar to above but more than one chip on each TDI/TDO pair.

JTAG muxes and multidrop

There are devices that provide access to multiple scan chains. These typically provide two levels of multiplexing. Second, a number of multdrop chips are wired in parallel on the backplane. Second, each device typically provides a number of TAP ports that can be switched into the chain. See National, Fairchild, and TI below. An article at embedded.com on scaling JTAG has more info on multi-drop multiplexors. TI uses a "linking shadow protocol" in which data on TDI in certain states other than Shift-IR/Data-IR is used to control the mux. Some of the others basically appear in the JTAG chain and control data is shifted into the instruction register. Until a device on the backplane bus has been selected, TDO is tristate. The linking shadow protocol is less consistent, perhaps, with JTAG philosophy but it could be advantagous when using software that doesn't understand port multiplexors as a utility program can be used to configure the multiplexor(s) and then the presence of the multiplexor is invisible to the software (provided it does not wiggle TDI in states where it is inappropriate to do so). Some multiplexors also have the ability for one of the slave ports to take over a master. This allows an embedded CPU to perform built in self test or reconfiguration while still allowing external test. Many of the multiplexors also allow the JTAG slave ports to be tristated allowing an external JTAG tester to be connected. This could be used, for example, to perform on chip debug on a microcontroller that normally appears in the JTAG chain.ses

JTAG Pinouts

In the descriptions, pins will be described as being connected to pins on a PC parallel port; this involves a buffer or at least a resistor, and often both. All connectors are 0.025" square pin headers with 0.1" spacing unless otherwise noted.

Xilinx

This pinout is used on the Spartan3, Spartan3E, and CPLD development kits sold by Xilinx (and designed by digilent). It is the pinout used by the Digilent (software compatible with Parallel III but different pinout) . Schematic for the JTAG3 can be found in figure A-9 (page 66) of Xilinx UG13- Spartan-3 Starter Kit Board User Guide (Now deleted). This cable claims to work from 1.5 to 5V but at lower voltages the driver running off the JTAG VDD may have trouble driving a logic 1 on the buffered TDO line to the PC and probably relies on a pullup resistor on the parallel port. Uses NL37WZ17 to drive signals (100 ohm series resistor) and NL17SZ126 to read back TDO.

      TMS  1     
      TDI  2
      TDO  3
      TCK  4
      GND  5
      VDD  6

      JTAG        Parallel port
      ----        ------------------------
      VCC   1        15  (vcc sense)
      GND   2          
      (key) 3
      TCK   4        3   (tristated by pin 5 high)      
      (key) 5  
      TDO   6       pin 6 drives ???? (open collector), read back on pin 13
      TDI   7       pin 2 drives  (tristated by pin 5 high)
      (key) 8
      TMS   9       4    (tristated by pin 5 high)

Pins 8 (D6), 11 (BUSY), and 12 (PE) are jumpered together on the parallel port and cable detect probably comes from this and by wiggling pin 6 and seeing if pin 13 responds.

The Parallel Cable III also has another header used for non-jtag modes. Some of the features like driving TDO and tristate enables probably have more to do with the other connector.

      VCC   1
      GND   2
      CCLK  3
      (key) 4
      (key) 5
      D/P   6
      DIN   7
      PROG  8
      (key) 9

Note that the two connectors are side by side, effectively making a 2x9 header and that numerous pins have been removed for keying purposes. The Parallel Cable III comes with flying leads http:

The Xilinx Parallel Cable IV

2mm connector
                 JTAG  Slave Serial SPI
                 ---  ------------ ----
       GND  1 2  Vref   Vref       Vref
       GND  3 4  TMS    PROG        SS
       GND  5 6  TCK    CCLK        SCK
       GND  7 8  TDO    DONE        MISO
       GND  9 10 TDI    DIN         MOSI
       GND 11 12 NC     NC          NC 
       GND 13 13 NC    INIT          NC
"Pin 1 is not  a true digital ground.  It must be connected to digital ground at the target system."
Note that this cable has logic on board with an internal 40Mhz clock and can send data at up to 5MHz, it is not a simple buffer.   It can also emulate a Parallel Cable III.   

Old text: The Spartan 3 board has another JTAG header for use with the Xilinx Parallel Cable IV and MultiPro Desktop Tool. This pinout for this 2mm connector is:

                JTAG        Serial
     GND  1  2  VCCAUX       Vref
     GND  3  4  TMS          PROG
     GND  5  6  TCK          CCLK
     GND  7  8  TDO-A        DONE
     GND  9 10  TDI          CCLK
     GND 11 12  (NC)         (NC)
     GND 13 14  (NC)         INIT

Altera

     TCK  1 2 GND
     TDO  3 4 ND
     TMS  5 6 N/C
     N/C  7 8 N/C
     TDI  9 10 GND 

Note that this pinout is A subset of the JTAG10PIN pinout used on atmel AVR micros.

ARM

Official 20 pin pinout

      VTref   1 2  Vsupply
      nTRST   3 4  GND
      TDI     5 6  GND
      TMS     7 8  GND
      TCK     9 10 GND
      RTCK   11 12 GND
      TDO    13 14 GND
      nSRST  15 16 GND
      DBGRQ  17 18 GND
      DBGACK 19 20 GND

All ground pins must be connected. DBGRQ and DBGACK are rarely used; they connect to lines on the ARM core that are rarely brought out to physical pins and are manipulated via other means (as bits in the jtag chain?). nSRST is the system reset (active low) and it is optional but recommended as Multi-ICE and RealView ICE uses is for debug of XScale processors, reset on startup, reset from the debugger, and reset detection and is needed for Auto Configuration on some processors. nTRST is optional, it resets the JTAG TAP controller state mahine and the embedded ICE logic. Resetting of the TAP controller can be accomplished by 5 TCK cycles with TMS high> AT91SAM7 CPUs don't bring nTRST to a pin. OpenOCD can be configured to work with or without nTRST and nSRST. Both reset signals are open drain. RTCK is an optional readback on the TCK pin and is used for adaptive clocking. Vsupply is used to power the JTAG dongle and VTref is used to set the thresholds. ARM's official jtag interfaces put a 10K pulldown resistor on these lines. ARM recommends 10K pullups/pulldowns with pullups on TMS, TDI, TDO, nSRST, and nTRST and a pulldown (odd) on TCK. Atmel's AT91SAM7 eval board uses pullup on TCK. Multi-ICE, RealView ICE, and OpenOCD support other devices on the JTAG chain, however manual configuration may be required. Multi-ICE uses analog switches (between ground and VTref) to drive the JTAG signals with 100 ohm series resistors.

K9JTAG

    TRST   1  2   TDO
    RTCK   3  4   TDI
    GND    5  6   TCK
    GND    7  8   TMS
    +3V    9  10   RESET

Altera USB blaster

Altera makes a cable called the USB blaster. Someone made a USB jtag with a EZ-USB FX2 partly emulating at FT245 that switched to using USB blaster protocol or Xilinx USB cable?, works with openwince and openocd. Looks like this software is actually running on the xilinx platform cable usb on the start kit. So this would have info on altera's protocol.

TI DSP

     TMS      1   2 nTRST
     TDI      3   4 GND
     Vcc      5   6 N/C
     TDO      7   8 Vcc
     TCK      9   10 GND
     TCK_ret 11   12 GND
     EMU0    13   14 EMU1

TI MSP430 Microcontrollers

    TDO   1 2 VCC_IN
   TDI    3 4 VCC_OUT
   TMS    5 6 NC
   TCK    7 8 TEST/VPP
   GND    9 10 NC
 RST/NMI 11 12 NC
   NC    13 14 NC

ARM

Multi-ICE (Amontec Jtagkey):

         VREF   1 2 VREF
         TRST_N 3 4 GND
         TDI    5 6 GND
         TMS    7 8 GND
         TCK    9 10 GND
         n/c   11 12 GND
         TDO   13 14 GND
         SRST_N 15 16 GND
         n/c   17 18 GND
         n/c   19 20 GND

JTAGKey to FTDIchip pin map (channel A):
  ADBUS0   TCK
  ADBUS1   TDI
  ADBUS2   TDO
  ADBUS3   TMS
  ADBUS4   JTAG output enable
  ADBUS5   VREF sense, negated (vref>1.26V?)
  ADBUS6   nSRST IN
  ADBUS7
  ACBUS0   nTRST
  ACBUS1   nSRST
  ACBUS2   nTRST driver enable
  ACBUS3   nSRST driver enable

 (VTref) Vcc    1  2   GND
         nTRST  3  4   GND
         TDI    5  6   GND
         TMS    7  8   GND
         TCK    9  10  GND
         TDO   11  12  N/C (nSRST)
         Vcc   13  14  GND

MIPS

Many MIPS processor based systems use the EJTAG pinout.

nTRST  1  2 GND
TDI    3  4 GND
TDO    5  6 GND
TMS    7  8 GND
TCK    9 10 GND
nSRST 11 12 (key)
DINT  13 14 VCC

EJTAG

EJTAG refers to MIPS JTAG extensions for on chip debugging. "EJTAG provides run control, breakpoints on both data and instructions, real-time Program Counter trace". On some chips it provides direct memory access as well. EJTAG at hardwarehacking.com

Linksys/broadcom Routers

Note that some appear to use the standard ARM 20 pin, others use a 12 or 14 pin connector (looks MIPS EJTAG style).

 nTRST  1   2 GND
 TDI    3   4 GND
 TDO    5   6 GND
 TMS    7   8 GND
 TCK    9  10 GND
 nSRST 11  12 GND

 nTRST  1   2 GND
 TDI    3   4 GND
 TDO    5   6 GND
 TMS    7   8 GND
 TCK    9  10 GND
 nSRST 11  12 n/a
   n/a 13  14 Vcc

Atmel AVR

  TCK  1 2 GND
  TDO  3 4 VTref
  TMS  5 6 nSRST
       7 8 (nTRST)
  TDI 9 10 GND

Flying Leads

Flying leads can be used to connect to different jtag connectors without having a bunch of adapters. Amp-modu or c-grid contacts can be used to mate with 0.100" contacts to add flying leads. They are a pain to connect and disconnect, though. A milmax SSQ style connector (long tail version) has female contacts and a wirewrap (0.100") posts; flying leads can be connected to such a connector to ease connecting and disconnecting. The part number for a 2x10 would probably be SSQ-110-03-G-D (gold tail) or SSQ-110-03-S-D (tin); available at digikey. If anyone knows where to get packages of precrimped on wires (both ends) bare amp-modu or c-grid contacts, let me know; they are very handy for making custom JTAG cables and many other custom cables using these upiquitous connectors. With insulation (heat shrink) suitable for use as flying leads, they are available at schmartboard ($10/5 or $38/100); seetron.com, linkins4.com, and superdroidrobots.com, and digikey (924964-ND) sell similar but are more expensive.

PCI/PCI express

PCI/PCI express slots have some pins set aside so a board can be inserted and get access to the motherboard JTAG chain. Apparently some motherboards don't connect it. And most POST display diagnostic cards aren't smart enough to bring the JTAG out to a header; I have yet to find one that does. Your best bet might be to tack solder some wires on a PCI card. Even www.uxd.com which makes a wide variety of POST cards, some with RS-232 serial output and one with I2C and even cards which self boot. SMBus may be accessable as well?

JTAG Details

A JTAG Test Access Port (TAP) consists of 4 signals, with an optional fifth signal:

• TMS - Test Mode Select (input from controller) (pullup required to force entry into reset state in event of a bad connection on TMS).
• TCK - Test Clock (input from controller)
• TDI - Test Data In (input from controller)
• TDO - Test Data Out (output to controller or next chip in chain)
• TRST* - Test Reset (optional, input from controller)

Most JTAG interface connectors have a Vcc/Vdd/Vref pin that is used to adjust the level translators to the appropriate voltage level for the system. In addition, many JTAG interfaces have a system reset line; you may want to sense the state of that line to signal a debugger when a chip has been reset. You may also want to measure the presence of Vref. Since some systems use the JTAG pins for other purposes as well, you may want to tristate the outputs. The voltage level varies depending on the technology being used. Multiple chips (or even boards) with JTAG support can be chained together with the TDO of each chip connected to the TDI of the next. The remaining signals are connected in parallel. Timing is based on the TCK pin so a PC parallel port (with appropriate voltage translation if needed) can be used as a controller. TDI/TMS data is latch on the rising edge of TCK. TDI/TDO/TMS typically change on the falling edge of TCK. You could probably do a full synchronous implementation where the data changes on the rising edge but you would have to be carefull with cable skew and hold types.

Note that the idea of having a TRST line may be less so the pod can reset the TAP controller, which is unnecessary since 5 TCKs with TMS high will accomplish the same result, and more so the board design can pull TRST low through a low value pull-down resistor which the POD can override. Thus, it may be necessary to implement TRST even if you have no need to use it.

In addition, some microcontrollers have a trace port (called ETM on ARM7TDMI). Since the internal address and databus are not usually brought out to pins the trace port can be used to monitor the flow of program execution. On the ARM7TDMI, this is about 8 signals clocked out at the CPU clock rate. By decoding those signals, you can tell when the next instruction in sequence has been executed and when a branch has been taken. A debugger with access to a copy of the code loaded into the micro, a which thus knows the size of each instruction and the destination of each branch can map the flow. Interrupts, however, could complicate this. On ARM7TDMI, a low on RTCK during reset may enable the ETM port. The ETM is configured through the JTAG interface. Use of ETM involves giving up some I/O lines.

JTAG TAP Controller

Each JTAG enabled chip has a TAP controller with a state machine with 16 states. The state of the TMS pin at each TCK pulse dictates the transitions between states. These states help control whether you are shifting through the instruction register or one of the data register and control the capture of data into the shift registers and latching of data from them.

Here is a diagram of the TAP controller state machine, produced using graphviz (requires browser/plugin SVG support):

Each ellipse denotes a state and each arrow denotes a transition from one state to another. There are two transitions from each state, one taken when TMS=0 and one taken when TMS=1. The shift IR and Shift DR states are emphasized because that is where you will spend the most time (other than when idle). These are the states where data is shifted in on TDI and out on TDO and the machine will stay in those states as long as TMS=0. The Exit* and Pause* states are not terribly interesting. For either the data or instruction registers, you usually start by passing through the Capture_* state which loads data from the chip into the register, proceed to the shift* state where the captured data is shifted out while the new data from the PC is shifted in, and then make your way through a couple minor states to the update state where the new data is latched into the chip.

Here is the TAP controller state machine as a table, which is easily converted into C, VHDL, Verilog, or other languages.

Note that aside from the first two states, the remaining states are divided into two sets of 7 states which are almost identical except that one set deals with the instruction register and one deals with the data register. These two sets of states deal with three operations: capture, shift, and update. Capture loads data from the chip into the corresponding register.Data is latched on the rising edge of TCK when exiting the capture state. Shift moves the data out through TDO while new data is shifted in on the TDI pin. The update-xx states cause the data from the shift register to be transfered to the selected register. The update occurs on the falling edge of TCK while still in the update state.

The state machines main states are reset, run/idle, shift DR, and shift IR.

Data is shifted in on the rising edge of TCK and data out becomes valid on the falling edge of TCK (to be latched on the rising edge). I.E. Rising edge is the active edge for input and output and the transitions occur at the falling edge. TMS=0 to keep the controller in the shift-xx state until all the data is shifted out; TMS=1 when the last bit is shifted.

Five TCKs with TMS high will reset the state machine to the Test-Logic-Reset state from any other state.

C implementation

   #define TAP_TEST_LOGIC_RESET 0
   #define TAP_RUN_TEST_IDLE 8
   #define TAP_SELECT_DR_SCAN 1
   #define TAP_CAPTURE_DR  2
   #define TAP_SHIFT_DR_SCAN 3
   #define TAP_EXIT1_DR 4
   #define TAP_PAUSE_DR 5
   #define TAP_EXIT2_DR 6
   #define TAP_UPDATE_DR 7
   #define TAP_SELECT_IR_SCAN 9
   #define TAP_CAPTURE_IR 10
   #define TAP_SHIFT_IR 11
   #define TAP_EXIT1_IR 12
   #define TAP_PAUSE_IR 13
   #define TAP_EXIT2_IR 14
   #define TAP_UPDATE_IR 15
   int jtag_tap_controller_state_machine(int tms) 
    {
       static int state=TAP_TEST_LOGIC_RESET;
       int nextstate;
       switch(state) {
            case(TAP_TEST_LOGIC_RESET): if(!tms) {nextstate=TAP_RUN_TEST_IDLE;} else {  ; } break;
	    case(TAP_RUN_TEST_IDLE): if(!tms) { ; } else {nextstate=TAP_SELECT_DR_SCAN;} break;
	    case(TAP_SELECT_DR_SCAN): if(!tms) {nextstate=TAP_CAPTURE_DR;} else {nextstate=TAP_SELECT_IR_SCAN;} break;
	    case(TAP_CAPTURE_DR): if(!tms) {nextstate=TAP_SHIFT_DR;} else {nextstate=TAP_EXIT1_DR;} break;
	    case(TAP_SHIFT_DR): if(!tms) { ; }; else {nextstate=TAP_EXIT1_DR}; break;
	    case(TAP_EXIT1_DR): if(!tms) { nextstate=TAP_PAUSE_DR;} else {nextstate=TAP_UPDATE_DR;} break;
	    case(TAP_PAUSE_DR): if(!tms) { ; } else {nextstate=TAP_EXIT2_DR}; break;
	    case(TAP_EXIT2_DR): if(!tms) { nextstate=TAP_SHIFT_DR; } else {nextstate=TAP_UPDATE_DR;} break;
	    case(TAP_UPDATE_DR): if(!tms) {nextstate=TAP_RUN_TEST_IDLE; } else {nextstate=TAP_SELECT_DR_SCAN;}; break;
	    case(TAP_SELECT_IR_SCAN): if(!tms) {nextstate=TAP_CAPTURE_IR;} else {nextstate=TAP_TEST_LOGIC_RESET;} break;
	    case(TAP_CAPTURE_IR): if(!tms) {nextstate=TAP_SHIFT_IR;} else { nextstate=TAP_EXIT1_IR; } break;
	    case(TAP_SHIFT_IR): if(!tms) { ; } else {nextstate=TAP_EXIT1_IR;} break;
	    case(TAP_EXIT1_IR): if(!tms) { nextstate=TAP_PAUSE_IR; } else { nextstate=TAP_UPDATE_IR; } break;
            case(TAP_PAUSE_IR): 	if(!tms) { ; } else {nextstate=TAP_EXIT2_IR; } break;
	    case(TAP_EXIT2_IR): if(!tms) { nextstate=TAP_SHIFT_IR; } else {nextstate=TAP_UPDATE_IR; } break;
            case(TAP_UPDATE_IR): if(!tms) {nextstate=TAP_RUN_TEST_IDLE; } else {nextstate=TAP_SELECT_DR_SCAN; } break;
            default: nextstate=TAP_TEST_LOGIC_RESET;	    
       }
       state=nextstate;
       return(state);
    }

This code is an example, intended for illustrations, it hasn't been tested. "enum" types may be used instead of "#define". This function should be called once on the rising edge of TCK. While you probably don't want to implement a TAP controller in software on an actual hardware device (it would be very slow), simulating one is useful for keeping track of the state of a controller you are talking too, debugging, educational purposes, etc. This example can also be pretty easily converted to VHDL or Verilog for synthesis or simulation. Note that #defined values for the various states were chosen so that the similarly named instructions (which have similar state transitions) share 3 bits in common to facilitate logic minimization.

IEEE 1149 has the combinatorial form of the state machine logic expressed as a 4 sums of 17 products, each product having at most 4 inputs. Thus 21 4 input LUTs could be used to implemnt that logic (about double that when you include the sequential portion).

The instruction Register (required)

The size of the instruction register varies from chip to chip. Minimum is 2 bits. It contains a shift register, a storage register, and decode logic. The value 01 is loaded into the two least significant bits of the instruction shift register during the capture-ir state. The instruction register also functions as a status register. What is loaded into the other bits depends on the chip.

Required Instructions

BYPASS

The bypass instruction is all 1s. The bypass register is loaded with a 0 when the bypass instruction is executed and the chip enters the Shift-DR state. The contents of the bypass register are ignored during an update-DR. With multiple devices in the chain, you can selectively put some devices into bypass mode by loading a bypass instruction into some instruction registers and another instruction, such as sample/preload, into the others.

SAMPLE/PRELOAD

This instruction loads the state of each input pin into the boundary scan register and also the internal logic state of each output pin. This instruction does not interfere with normal functions. Sample and Preload may be separate or combined.

EXTEST

External test. This does interfere with normal function. It performs an external boundary scan test to test things like chip to chip connections. In EXTEST mode, each Update-DR state causes data in the boundary scan register to be driven to the output pins. The Capture-DR state causes data from the input pins and internal states for the output pins to be loaded into the boundary shift register (similar to sample/preload). Data is shifted on the rising edge of TCK.

Optional Public Instructions

IDCODE (Optional in 1149.1, Required in 1532)

This instruction allows the chip ID code to be read.

USERCODE (Optional in 1149.1, Required in 1532)

INTEST

RUNBIST

ISC_ENABLE

ISC_DISABLE

ISC_PROGRAM

ISC_READ

ISC_ERASE

ISC_DISCHARGE

ISC_PROGRAM_USERCODE

ISC_PROGRAM_DONE

ISC_ERASE_DONE

ISC_PROGRAM_SECURITY

ISC_READ_INFO

ISC_DATA_SHIFT

ISC_ADDRESS_SHIFT

ISC_INCREMENT

ISC_SETUP

PROBE (1149.4)

EXTEST_PULSE(1149.6)

EXTEST_TRAIN(1149.6)

Other

Additional part specific instructions can be defined. These can be used for things like built in self test, programming flash memory, and On Chip Debug.

Private Instructions

Presumably used for things like factory test. If a chip has, for example, a CPU, RAM, FLASH, FPGA, IO, and bus interconnect blocks, there may be separate or combined scan chains around each block. With a block, there may be internal cells used to further partition the logic into testable domains.

Registers

A JTAG device contains multiple registers or chains accessable via the TAP port. If the TAP controller is in the Shift-IR state, the instruction register will be used. In the Shift-DR, the register inserted into the chain will depend on the currently active instruction in the instruction register.

Standard Data Registers

In addition, to the instruction register, each device has more than one data register. At any given time, data is shifted though either the instruction register or one of the data registers depending on the state of the TAP controller and the last instruction loaded. Registers are shifted LSB first.

The boundary-scan register (required)

The boundary-scan register typically contains one or more bits for each logic pin on the device. More than one bit is needed to deal with output enables and direction controls for some pins. All device inputs must be observable and all device outputs controllable through the boundary scan register. The register may provide access to internal states associated with each pin.

The bypass Register (required)

This is a single bit wide shift register connecting TDI and TDO. It is selected in bypass mode and is used to minimize the number of bits that need to be shifted when accessing other chips. Why a one bit delay? Without it, you would end up with an analog delay in TDI proportional to the number of chips and under some conditions, TCK would get there before TDI would.

Device ID register (optional)

This is a 32 bit register that contains information that can be used to identify the specific chips in the chain.

User-Defined (optional)

Boundary scan cell types

A basic boundary scan cell contains two flip flops and some multiplexors. Boundary scan cells are chained together to make a long shift and store type register with preload. The first mux and the two flip flops shown above make up a basic cell of your garden variety shift and store register. The first flip flop is part of the shift register and the second part of the store register. The last MUX selects between normal operation (PI -> PO) and the boundary scan system taking over control of the signal. Input signals (to the cells, may be internal or external signals depending on the cell function). 1 to 3 basic cells are tied together to make the cell used on each I/O pin. The SI and SO pins (shift in and shift out) of adjacent cells are tied together in a log daisy chain. The PI and PO pins contain "parallel" data to be captured in Capure-DR state or output in Update-DR state. Depending on the state of the Mode signal, PI may be passed directly through to PO (normal operating mode for the chip). The mux on the left selects between shift modes (Shift-DR state) and preload (Capture-DR state). The UpdateDR signal is clocked when the TAP controller reaches Update-DR state, latching the data from the shift register into the store register. The first flip flop is sometimes called "CAP" and the second "UPD".

"Cell" will be used somewhat interchangably here to refer to either the simple cell or the 1,2, or 3 cluster of simple cells associated with a pin. The stanandard neglects to give the two separate names.

Before you can understand the interaction between the boundary scan logic cells and the I/O buffers, you need to understand the nature of the I/O buffers. There are four basic types: output only, input only, tristate output, and bidirectional. We will focus on the bidirectional buffer the other types are degenerate forms of the bidirectional Open drain and open source signals are also degenerate forms, with one of the driver FETs missing. The bidirectional pin is not simply a magic buffer on an internal tristate bus. It is very hard to make a bidirectional buffer work without a direction signal provided (see the section on level translation) and attempts to do so will offer poor performance in a variety of circumstances. Tristate buses are rarely used internal to the chip and in many cases they are prohibited. An internal tristate bus can have problems with capacitance, fanout, and the internal drivers, being much smaller than external I/O buffers, may be damaged by bus contention. So tristate buses are typically replaced with some sort of multiplexor arrangement. Typically, a bidirectional signal on an IC pin connects to the internal logic as three separate signals: input, output, and output enable.

Each cell has a general cell type (corresponding to the section headings below and denoting its function) and also references a CELL_INFO structure ("BC_0", "BC_1", "BC_2", etc.), which gives some more info on its structure, from the STD_1149_1_2001 header file or a user defined cell type. CELL_INFO tells you what signals the first mux connects to in various states; see section B.10.2.2 in 1149.1-2001. The comments preceeding the cell definitions contain obscure references to figures in the standard, i.e. "f11-18" means "Figure 11-18".

Each pin may have more than one cell type associated with it. An input pin will require 1 cell, a simple output 1 or 2 cells, a tristate output 2 or 3 cells, and a bidirectional pin 2 or 3 cells.

The picture below gives a cluster of three cells for a bidirectional pin. Other forms of pins can be approximated by simply removing the unnecessary logic. Don't forget, though, that even if a pin is output only, you probably still want to be able to capture the state at the pin so when minimizing the logic for an output, you can eliminate the input connection to the internal logic but keep the cell (possibly discarding the second flip flop and mux). Note: this is a zoomable image; click on it. Cells may not necessarily be daisy chained in the order shown. The first mux may vary from the diagram. Possible input sources are PI (parallel in), PO (parallel out OR the pin itself), UPD (the output of the second flip flop), CAP (the output of the first flip flop), X (unknown state), ZERO, or ONE in addition to the SI signal and may vary depending on whether you are in EXTEST, SAMPLE, or INTEST.

The configuration shown in the diagram above is all you really need for both internal and external test if you are designing a chip or for basic conceptual understanding. However, other configurations are used and may reflect corner cutting or other arbitrary choices. General purpose boundary scan software will need to parse the BSDL file.

OBSERVE_ONLY: Observe only cell

Allows test system to sample the state on that pin but not assert state to either the pin or external logic. It is like the INPUT cell in the diagram above except: PO goes nowhere and the second flip flop and mux can be eliminated.

OUTPUT2: 2 state output

Allows test system to sample the value being driven onto the pin by internal logic (used for internal tests) or drive a value on to the pin (external tests). OUTPUT3: 3 state output (2 bit)

One bit is used for the signal and one for the enable line. Four states can be read (drive high, drive low, tristate high, tristate low) and "driven". Can sample the output and enable signals from internal logic or drive the output pin (with tristate).

INPUT: Input Only /H3>

Can sample the input pin or drive a value into the internal logic.

BIDIR_IN, BIDIR_OUT: Bidirectional

This is a method of cutting corners and reducing shift chain size. The input and output cells are replaced, with the aid of muxes, with a single cell. You can't read the actual logic state on the pin when it is being driven, so you can't test the driver itself, unless the driver output is coupled back to the input instead of the PO pin. This allowed by newer versions of 1149.1 though the BSDL becomes ambiguous since the pins are still identified as reading back "PO" (normally the input to the driver), not the actual pin output..

CLOCK: observe only for clock pin

CONTROL: output enable or in/out direction control

CONTROLR: control cell with test-logic-reset initiated set/reset

INTERNAL: associated with internal logic

Other combinations

An Enhanced Cell

Here I have sketched up a concept for an advanced cell configuration for improved testability. This is a zoomable image. This cell cluster has programmable pull-up and pull-down and an input comparator with programable threshold. There are some ways to minimize it. A couple cells, one output only and one input only, can be combined. Also, instead of a separate pull up and pull down, it is possible to have two enables to allow the main driver to be strong or weak.

Internal user scan chains for programable logic

With a trivial amount of extra logic, a programmable logic vendor can provide a way to create internal scan chains. On Spartan 3 and 3E FPGAs, the BSCAN_SPARTAN3 block provides up to two internal scan chains using the USER1 and USER2 instructions. A better design would have simply provided one mux input and provided access to the instruction register bits so that a large number of scan chains, that look like any other scan chains, could be created thus being able to fully simulate a JTAG enabled device except for the instructions having an offset to account for the built in chains. As it is, the user could use the USER1 instruction to select a chain and the USER2 to access it. If the internal JTAG chains are not used, the programmable logic must select the bypass register. Vertex II, Vertex-II Pro, and Virtex-4 families also have the USER1 and USER2 access, with the Virtex-4 providing up to four user chains.

A better way to implement this is to provide a single extra input on the TDO mux. If a fuse is not programmed, this input connects to the bypass register to conform 1149.1. If, however, the fuse is programmed, it connects to user logic. All undecoded instructions select the extra fuse input on the mux. This way, all unused opcodes select the bypass register, as required by 1149.1. All bits of the instruction register are brought out to the user logic, as are the capture and update strobes. With an 8 bit instruction register size, there would be a large number of unused instructions. For example, all instructions with the MSB=1, except 11111111 (EXTEST) could be used. User logic would provide a 1 bit alternative bypass register or provide a signal to the main mux that selects the bypass register for all undecoded instructions. User logic implements an expansion mux and strobe logic for as many registers as needed. Programable logic must clearly identify instructions which access internal factory test logic (this is normally done in the BSDL file, anyway).

Another method is to have a configuration fuse control a mux on TDO such that the user logic is inserted in the chain after the programmable logic on board TAP controller after the device is configured. This provides 100% emulation of an ASIC design's tap controller without a separate TAP port. However, it is likely to confuse the configuration software and it is a nuisance to recover from if your onchip TAP is defective.

One use for such an internal chain is to provide access to an internal wishbone bus via the normal JTAG pins.

Some CPLDs allow the TAP pins to be used as USER I/O pins with a logic level on one pin selecting the mode. Putting a jumper on the selection pin (or asserting it with a spare signal on the pod) can allow access to an internal user TAP or SPI circuit.

Limitations of PC Parallel Port JTAG

Some newer PCs do not come with a parallel port at all and USB to printer port adapters are generally not suitable for bit banging. A long, highly capacitive cable is likely to be needed to reach the system under test, which slows down the rate you can send data. Both the parallel port interface itself and the JTAG device are too slow for a modern processor to issue output instructions at full speed so you need a delay for each bit clocked (actually two delays). Since this delay is too short to use the system timer, you will need to use delay loops which will waste CPU time. Your JTAG code will consume close to 100% of the CPU time until preempted, at which point there will be a pause in the JTAG bitstream until your process gains control again, so the flow of JTAG data will be sporadic. It is possible to use advanced modes (ECP) of the parallel port (which is often disabled in the BIOS) to send data more efficiently but this would necessitate the use of a CPLD in the parallel pod which is not normally the case (Xilinx parallel cable IV appears to be an exception). Suppose you set your delay to be 1us and your process gets 30% of the available timeslots. Then you will be sending 500Khz bursts (you need to write to the port twice for each tck) one third of the time for an effective data rate of only 150Khz and wasting 30% of your CPU time. Even the Parallel cable IV can only do 2.5Mhz tck rate.

Boundary Scan Issues

When a JTAG device is driving signals through series resistors and the device on the other side doesn''t have JTAG, many tests will not detect shorts between adjacent resistor network pins. If you are actively driving your pins, the shorts will not overpower the driven outputs. Driving adjacent pins with test paterns a pin is tristated, however, may show that it follows the values of adjacent pins.

One type of patern is known as a wagner pattern. This basically involves assigning consequitive binary numbers to each net as a sequential test vector (STV). One bit from each STV makes up a parallel test vector (PTV). This pattern does a good job of detecting shorted nets with far fewer vectors than a walking ones or zeros test but not as good a job of isolating faults. A walking bit test requires of order N^2 tclk cycles, where N is the number of nets, while the wagner pattern is logarithmic. The wagner pattern is improved by sending out complements of the original vectors. The Parrallel Response Vectors (PRVs) are transformed into Sequential Response Vectors (SRVs); pins with the same SRV are probably shorted. The wagner pattern will detect some opens but additional open's testing is needed. In addition to the wagner test, an all 1s and all 0s PTV will help distinquish between stuck at 1 and stuck at 0 faults vs shorted nets. The assumption that either wagner patterns or walking bit patterns will detect shorted nets assumes that one driver wins.

"Algorithmic Extraction of BSDL from 1149.1-compliant Sample ICS", Ramond, et all, international Test Conference 1995, pg 561-568 explains how to extract BSDL from a sample chip (doesn't identify all the internal instructions).

Various faults in the JTAG chain itself can cause problems and some of these can be diagnosed.

• Break in scan chain. Broken TDO to TDI connection, unpowered chip, open TMS or TDI, etc. The chips after the fault will still load a deterministic state and shift data onto TDO, so you can use this to help isolate the fault.
• TDI shorted to TDO. This effectively wire-or or wire-ands the TDOs and makes the scan chain appear shorter. Algorithms that try to pinpoint a break in the scan chain may be fooled by this into isolating the fault to the wrong stage in the chain. One thing that is helpful is to measure the length of the scan chain by shifting in a known psuedorandom pattern after the normal data.
• TMS or TCK open, stuck at 1, or stuck at 0. globally
• TMS or TCK open, stuck at 1, or stuck at 0 local to one or more chips. Series resistors between the pins and the global bus, which is already used in some cases for voltage translation, may help with this making it behave similarly to a broken TDI to TDO connection.

Short circuit testing is normally performed first so you can power down a device quickly to minimize possibility of damage. The shorter the duration, the lower the proability of immediate or delated failure. Either the driver transistors or the bond wires may be damaged. In practice, digitial IC's often withstand more than you might expect. Investigation of Device Damage Due to Electrical Testing focuses on overvoltage spikes; likely to be more of an issue when you are testing interconnected boards.

Beware of test patterns thay may enable the output of an IC (such as a RAM OE) onto nets resulting in driver contention that may interfere with a test or cause damage.

intermediate-state shorts, where the result of shorting two nets together leads to indetermnate results are a problem for many logic families. Using a varying number of drivers on a net may tip the mid-state into a detectable region but may also increase the chances of driver damage (no worse than a short to GND/VCC). Tristate/O and Tristate/1 combinations instead of 0/1 may help detect but may also produce a lot of false positives. onTAP claims to be good at detecting midstate faults. The harder such a fault is to detect, the less likely it may produce imediate damage. If two 5V drivers shorted together produces a 2.5V level, that indicates that they are sharing the heating evenly; on the other hand, if a strong driver is competing with a weak driver, it is more likely to result in a determinate output. Shorts to power or ground, unless they are resistive, are likely to result in a determinate output .

More BSDL info

Pretty much all the useful information is in strings assigned to contstants or attributes. These strings can contain arrays of structures and other complicated forms that require parsing. These strings are split into pieces in potentially random ways and concatenated with "&". So, you can pretty much forget about a single stage parser. You have to parse the VHDLness to get the strings, and their constants, and then parse the contents of the strings.

The CELL_INFO array contains multiple records of type (a,b,c) where a is the context in which the cell is used (INPUT, OUTPUT2, OUTPUT3, INTERNAL, CONTROL, CONTROLR, CLOCK, BIDIR_IN, BIDIR_OUT, or OBSERVE_ONLY), b denotes the capture instruction (EXTEST, SAMPLE, or INTEST), and c denotes the data source captured (PI, PO, CAP, UPD, X, ZERO, or ONE (explained above)).

The BOUNDARY_REGISTER is a string (usually split over multiple lines and concatenated with "&"):

       cell_number "(" cell_type, port_id, function, safe_bit, [ccell disval rslt] "),"
     

PIN_MAP contains a mapping from signal names to pin numbers, separated by commas. "FOO:9" means PIN 9 is FOO. "Q:(1,2,3,4)" means that signal Q1 is on pin 1, Q2 is on pin 2, Q3 is on pin3, and Q4 is on pin4. Give or take a little. Q in this case is a bit_vector(1 to 4). If it was a bit_vector(0 to 3) this would probably be Q0 to Q4. The bit vector information comes from the "port" of the entity describing the part and this is one of the few places where you find information in actual VHDL.

cell number is usually sequential. function is one of INPUT, OUTPUT2, OUTPUT3, CONTROL, CONTROLR, INTERNAL, CLOCK, BIDIR, OBSERVE_ONLY. port_id is ???. safe_bit is one of 0,1 or X. The last three have to do with disabling a pin. They denote which cell number is disabled, what value (0 or 1) results in disabling, and what state results from disabling (Z, WEAK0, WEAK1, PULL0, PULL1, or KEEPER).

Probing an unknown chain

You should be able to connect a JTAG cable to any board and have it automatically determine:

• The number of devices on the chain
• The length of the instruction register on each device on the chain
• The total length on the chain in IR mode and in bypass mode
• The identity of each device on the chain

There are many reasons to probe an unknown chain. A generic program such as a debugger or serial flash loader may support specific chips and not care about other chips. It needs to know the configuration of the chain so it can put the other devices in bypass mode and add the appropriate number of dummy bits to the beginnng and end of the data stream. The inability to reliably probe an unknown chain is probably one primary reason a lot of microcontrollers need to be on their own separate chain to support debugging. Another reason may be a nuisance patent. Probing an unknown chain can also be used in a production environment to automatically select the appropriate test or download routines when a device is connected.

Automatic identification of boards which have the same chips on them is possible in a number of ways. You can change the order of the devices on the scan chain. You can use a common set of otherwise unused pins on a CPLD or other JTAG device which are hardwired on the PCB to a unique ID code. You can program an analog voltage on a JTAG ADC voltage monitor chip with a pair of resistors. Also, many JTAG programable logic devices have a user ID register that is programmed when the programmable logic is programmed; this is used to identify the unique firmware on an otherwise standard chip. Once a chip has been programmed once, using JTAG without auto ID or by programming the chip prior to part placement, the board can then be identified. These forms of auto ID can be used to automatically select the right firmware or guard against operator error during factory in circuit programming and test. They can also be used to identify boards installed into different slots in an embedded system.

SDIO

Note that it would be relatively simple to convert the SDIO slot on PDAs to a JTAG test controller, provided you have documentation on how to program the SD card port on your device.

Simulation of SN74BCT8244A boundary scan

Taken from the TI Scan Educator program. This is an 8 bit tristate bus driver with two enable pins. It contains an 18 cell boundary scan register with a two cell TI SCOPE specifc boundary control register, and a one cell bypass register.

Loading the sample/preload instruction

Initial state:
  TDI=0 TMS=1 TCK=0 (TDO=Z), test-logic-reset state

Now move from test-logic-reset to Shift-IR state with TMS={0,1,1,0,0)
  TDI=0 TMS=0 TCK=0 (TDO=Z)
  TDI=0 TMS=0 TCK=1 (TDO=Z)   
  (state now run-test/idle)
  TDI=0 TMS=0 TCK=0 (TDO=Z)

  TDI=0 TMS=1 TCK=0 (TDO=Z)
  TDI=0 TMS=1 TCK=1 (TDO=Z)
  (state now Select-DR-Scan)
  TDI=0 TMS=1 TCK=0 (TDO=Z)
  
  TDI=0 TMS=1 TCK=0 (TDO=Z)
  TDI=0 TMS=1 TCK=1 (TDO=Z)
  (state now Select-IR-Scan)
  TDI=0 TMS=1 TCK=0 (TDO=Z)

  TDI=0 TMS=0 TCK=0 (TDO=Z)
  TDI=0 TMS=0 TCK=1 (TDO=Z)    
  (status value captured into instruction shift register)
  (state now Capture-IR)
  TDI=0 TMS=0 TCK=0 (TDO=Z)

  TDI=0 TMS=0 TCK=0 (TDO=Z)
  TDI=0 TMS=0 TCK=1 (TDO=Z)
  (state now shift-IR)
  TDI=0 TMS=0 TCK=0 (TDO=1)

  SAMPLE/PRELOAD is 10000010  (shifted in LSB first)
  TMS=0 TDI={0,1,0,0,0,0,0}
  TMS=1 TDI={1}   // state transition on last bit

Parallel Port Pinouts

Note that this denotes the logical connections, not physical. Normally, there needs to be a buffer/level translator or at least a resistor. This table is concerned with software driver programming.

Speed Issues

JTAG spec allows up to 25 megabit per second transfers. According to hardwarehacking.org, "With a parallel port cable, however, you will be lucky to achieve more than about 400,000 bits-per-second.". The open source windrvr replacement notes it is limited to about 200Khz on the parallel cables. Note that there is some confusion in speeds, as they may sometimes refer to the port update rate and sometimes the tck rate (half that).

Bit banging vs bit stream

An FT232RL chip would probably acheive about the same speed as a parallel cable. Speed could be doubled by running open loop. An FT2232C/D chip in MPSSE mode would probably get around 5.6 megabits per second.

• Two bytes per tck cycle. TD232RL dumb chip, or equivalent
• One byte per tck cycle. Smart chip.
• One byte per 8 tck cycles, when TMS is static. TD2232 slightly less dumb chip or equivalent.
• Further compression. Smart chip.

Latency

Many poorly structured JTAG programs are written in such a way that they are very sensitive to latency and will slow down by many orders of magnitude when run over USB or IP. The debrick utility is an example of this. All I/O is done by calling clockin(), once for each bit. It reads the TDO line each time. USB 2.0 high speed is a high bandwidth link but it is also high latency. You get 1 I/O operation each millisecond (8 per millisecond in high speed). An efficient USB high speed pod could conceivably pump about 320 megabits per second of data (far more than most chips can handle) but writing two values to TCK and TDI and then reading TDO will take a millisecond or more, thus reducing the speed to under 1Khz (or 8khz for high speed). The solution to this is to delay parsing data which is read back. One approach is to pass a pointer to where to write the results and don't expect it to be updated immediately. Then write a bunch of data before reading the results. Even if you delay the read until you have written one word of flash, writing 3MB of flash will take 50 minutes. Higher performance over USB full speed could be acheived using templates stored on the microcontroller.

Sliding window

Use a sliding window approach to reading results. Thus you may send multiple vectors before you check the results of the first vector. Here is some oversimplified code:

   #define MAX_WINDOW 16
   int i;
   int response_count = 0;
   bit_vector_t stimulus_vector; 
   bit_vector_t response_vector[MAX_WINDOW];   
   for(i=0; i= (MAX_WINDOW-2) && ! vector_ready(response_count) {
       // spin
      }
      response_vector[i%MAX_WINDOW] = allocate_response_vector();
      generate_stimulus_vector(&stimulus_vector);
      send_vector(i, stimulus_vector, response_vector);
      if(vector_ready(response_count)) {
         check_response_vector(response_vector[response_count%MAX_WINDOW]);
         free_response_vector(response_vector[response_count%MAX_WINDOW]);
         response_count++;
      }
   }

Also, you can use feed forward to reduce latency issues. In this case, you send the data to be transfered, the data you expect back, and a mask indicating which data to ignore. This is also good to use as a primary programming API as the library can automate checking and it has more options as to what commands to send over the wire. It also lends itself to recording data files that can be played back later.

Compresion

Compression could allow higher JTAG speeds without needing a USB high speed. In flash programming, only 1 of the 4 address bytes changes 99% of the time. In typical sweeping 1 and 0 test vectors, only 1 or 2 bytes out of the entire vector needs to change. In most cases, the compression algorithm will use the last vector as a start. algorithm needs to be simple enough that it can be implemented on a typical microcontroller without slowing down to less than USB speeds. A very simple algorithm is to transmit 1 extra byte for each block of 8 bytes. The bits in that byte indicate which bytes change (and will be transmitted). Speed improvement up to 8x is possible, depending on the pattern. Another simple algorithm would be to send a offset as well as a length allowing a contiguous subset of bytes to be transmitted. Run length encoding could be used but that will have more cpu overhead.

Flash programming

Flash programming can involve a lot of JTAG traffic. In some cases, such as programming a non-jtag parallel flash chip by manipulating the pins on a CPU, many hundreds of bits may need to be sent over JTAG for every byte programmed so there can be a couple orders of magnitude of inefficiency. For JTAG flash devices, the overhead is probably less than an order of magnitude.

Xilinx CPLD/FPGA programming

Programming these devices appears to be very efficient as Xilinx appears to have set things up so that you just have to dump the entire bitstream into the TDI pin without interuption with a little setup and teardown before and after. This means that the number of JTAG operations is just a little more than the number of bits to be programmed.

Optoisolation

Some applications require opto-isolation. Getting fast enough isolators can be a problem. magnetic isolators may be preferable. An NVE IL261 ($9 digikey) is a 110Mbps part with 4 channels in one direction and 1 in the opposite. An ADUM1401CRWZ is similar (3 in one direction, 1 in the other) Note: consider an isolator that has inputs which line up with outputs and comes in a package in which low value resistors are also available.

Level Translation

The state of level translation ICs leaves a lot to be desired. Relying on pullup resistors can slow things down. 10K ohm pulling up 20pf gives a time constant of 200ns.

Test vectors

If you have 1000 pins, with 3 bits per pin, walking a 1 through each pin and reading the results would be about 3 million operations. Repeat for 0.

Shift instructions

Shift instructions should not be used to access bits. They are inefficient as they repeat the same calculation with the same results many times. For an 8 bit port:

   unsigned char keepmask;
   unsigned char tdimask;
   unsigned char tmsmask;
   unsigned char tdomask;
   unsigned char tckmask;
   unsigned char writexormask;
   unsigned char readxormask;

   value = inb(port) & keepmask;
   if(tdi) value |= tdimask;
   if(tms) value |= tmsmask;
   if(tck) value |= tckmask;
   value ^= writexormask;
   tdo = !! ((inb(port) ^ readxormask ) & tdomask);  
      // !! converts to 0 or 1 type boolean, as opposed to any bit set 
      (optional, depending on how used).
   outb(port, value);

   // Optional, if we are doing a full tck cycle.
   value ^= tckmask;
   outb(port, value);
  

Use a bootloader

Instead of trying to burn a flash using inefficient jtag sequences, download a tiny bootloader. The bootloader can load the file using USB, ethernet, or high speed TTL serial. On the ARM SAM7 cpus, there is a bootloader built into the chip, no jtag is even needed, though jtag could probably be used to trigger the bootloader without changing a jumper and cycling power. Some processors and FPGAs have an internally accessable register that is accessable via JTAG instructions. This can be used to communciate with a boot loader, and may work similarly (but faster) to having a serial port. A JTAG on chip debugger can be used to write to external flash memory locations much faster than boundary scan. And some chips have an onchip DMA mode (MIPS ejtag). A FPGA bootloader "program" can be used as well.

Interleaving sequences for multiple devices

Sequences for multiple devices can be interleaved but it can get tricky as one device may need a TAP controller state transition that corrupts the state of another device. Merging can save protocol overhead and it can take advantage of delays (such as during flash programming). External boundary scan for multiple devices can easily be merged; you shift the data into all devices simultaneously instead of sequentially loading each one. They are really parts of a larger test vector, anyway. Programming multiple similar flash devices with the same or different data should be possible if they use the same programming sequence but it gets more complicated if they use different sequences. Merging internal test data could become difficult. Simple vector sequences might be ok, but loading a new instruction, for example, might adversely affect the state of other devices. ISC_ILLEGAL_EXIT in the BSDL fileists instructions that will disrupt operation.

Ethernet

Ethernet pods can be useful in many situations. Ethernet provides 1500V of electrical isolation. Ethernet does not require the computer and the development system to be in the same room (though that is handy for debugging). Ethernet lets your download the software from your office while you are walking to the lab. An ethernet pod with an minimal LCD interface lets people on the production line program parts without a computer; the pod can communicate with a server which will serve images and tests. The pod can be server (with human interface) or a client. The daemon can interact with the user through the pod.

• Product 1
  • Download Firmware
    • Version 1.0
    • Version 1.1 - Option 1
    • Version 1.1 - Option 2
  • Perform Test
    • unconnected test
    • loopback test
    • interconnected boards test
• Product 2
  • Download Firmware
    • Version 1.0
    • Version 1.1 - Option 1
    • Version 1.1 - Option 2
  • Perform Test
    • unconnected test
    • loopback test
    • interconnected boards test

Protocol and API suggestions

These are my notes. I am considering implementing what you see written here. They may be

There is a need for a new well designed universal cross platform jtag suite (library, drivers, and applications) with a permissive license (NOT GPL) that can be used by any software, commercial or open source, with any pod, on any target, whether it is connected via parallel port, USB, or ethernet. Much of the existing software is infested with the GPL license, even at the library level. An orwellian copyleft license is focused on denying "bad" behavior (without regard to how many good activities are also denied) rather than allowing "good" behavior.

Just a few GPL incompatabilities:

• We want Xilinx, Altera, Atmel, Actel, TI, Freescale, Microchip, etc. to use the stack because that will allow us, for example, to program our FPGA with our microcontroller pod. That isn't going to happen with GPL; it is going to be tough enough to get them to see reason and use a permisively licensed stack. They need to remember they are in the chip business not the pod business. For every customer they force to buy their pod, they have lost many more. For every customer they prevent from using a competitor's part because they are locked in by their current pod purchase, they have lost a competitor's customer who would have switched. An engineer may need to use a mix of processors and programmable logic from many different vendors, plus development tools and test tools. Xilinx is starting to use the permissively licensed open source USB pod driver that replaces windrvr. That would not have happened with GPL.
• Like it or not, many products have secret details at least during some part of their development (i.e. before released to the public). ATE code embodies some of those details. At the same time, they need to release information to subcontractors under NDA. Not GPL compatible. Don't like assholes who sell products without technical documentation? Don't buy their product. Xilinx won't document their Platform cable USB? Buy from someone else. Broadcom won't document their routers? Buy a WRAP, instead. Microchip won't document their onchip debugging protocol? Don't use microchip CPUs.

  Universal Non-disclosure agreement: if you don't disclose the technical details of your product we agree not to buy it.

• Value added software. If the cost exceeds the value added, don't buy it.

A JTAG library needs to have a license that allows the code to be used in either a commercial pod or a permisively licensed one (and i don't give a damn whether or not it allows use in a GPLed pod), or otherwise embedded in a target system. And a JTAG front end client (command line or gui) needs to allow proprietary extensions (either from a vendor or an end user) and needs to be compatible with permissively licensed software. Even LGPL would be of somewhat limited value to the JTAG community.

I despise the GPL. Back when I started giving away code for free, free code was really free. Then Stallman came along an screwed it up. GPL tries to prevent people from doing "bad" things and it doesn't care who it hurts in the process and how many "good" things are prevented. Permissive licenses allow people to do "good" things and don't care if other people do "bad" things. The latter philosphy is vastly superior. GPL has little effect on psychopathic corporations but it can have an enormous effect on altruistic small businesses. A commercial library may cost a developer a $100. A GPL library can cost him his livelyhood. And those of us who are trying to give away as much as we can are far more affected by this than the freeloaders. The GPL "commons" is itself a freeloader. It steals from the public domain and permissive license commons but gives nothing back. If you want to make a real contribution to humanity, don't use GPL, use a permissive license (such as three clause BSD).

We all take from the creative commons. We should all try to give something back.

Protocol

Here are some thoughts on an API and protocol structure. The idea is to keep the pod code simple, though some pods may implement more functionality. Most vectors involve a lot of clocking TDI with TMS static with some TMS stuff at the beginning and end. The TMS stuff can be almost bitbanged, i.e. we send a byte down the wire for each bit clocked (as opposed to two bytes). So, a typical vector could consist of a few JTAGBITBANGs or individual state transitons for setup, a STREAMSERIAL or COMPRESSSERIAL for the vector, and at the API level, many of the functions will have a default implementation that calls other simpler functions if an unimplemented function is called. JTAGBITBANGs can optionally be used, with some loss of efficiency, to handle extra TDI bits and the beginning and end of a VECTOR (such as bypass bits) without realligning the data.

Lengths will usually be in bits; streams data will be padded to an even number of bytes; the extra bits will be ignored.

• NOP - used to resync.
• GETCAPABILITIES - find out what the pod supports. At the API level, their will be one getcapabilities for the pod and one for the driver, so an application can tell what capabilities are implemented directly and which ones are emulated.
• SETRATENS ns - set update rate in nanoseconds
• SETRATEHZ hz - set update rate in hz
• SETPORT ? - selects one or more ports to send data to. Multiple ports can be used for gang programming or to test two or more interconnected boards.
• SETPINDIR pin, direction (1byte)
• SETPIN pin, value (1byte)
• CONFIGCLK port, pin, polarity - configures which pin is TCK or SCK
• CONFIGDO port, pin, polarity - configures which pin is TDO or MOSI
• CONFIGDI port, pin, polarity - configures which pin is TDI or MISO
• CONFIGTMS port, pin, polarity - configures which pin is TMS or CS
• CLOCKTDITMS tdi, tms, response - clocks the tdi and tms bits, wiggling the clock line.
• BITBANG8 (byte)
• BITBANG12 (short) - for 12 line ports
• BITBANG16 (short)
• BITBANG32 (long)
• JTAGBITBANG tms, tdo, tms, tck, trst, srst - like BITBANG but the pod (or the driver) does the translation (lookup table) from logical bits to physical bits. If pod doesn't support, reverts to two BITBANGs.
• STREAMPARALLEL count, data (8 bit words) used for bit banging.
• STREAMSERIAL count, response, data - 8 bit words are serialized onto the TDO pin and optionally the TDO pin is sent back. If response is true, TDO data will be sent back. If pod doesn't support streamserial (parallel, FT232RL), then STREAMPARALLEL will be used instead
• COMPRESSSERIAL count, response, uselast, algorithm, data - like stream serial but uses compression. If pod doesn't support compression, streamserial will be used instead.
• STREAMSERIALWITHCOMPARE, like streamserial but sends the expected responses for matching
COMPRESSSERIALWITHCOMPARE, like compressserial but sends the expected responses for matching
• SYNCMASTER - toggles the sync pin used to connect multiple jtag pods together
• SYNCSLAVE - waits for a change on the sync pin
• DELAY clocks if not supported, reverts to NOP or BITBANG.
• SHIFTIR ? - shift data into instruction register chain
  Note: SVF defines instructions that can prepend and append fixed bits to each SHIFTIR/SHIFTDR transfer so we only need to send data for the chip of interest. It also allows one to specify the bits you expect back on the TDO pin, with a mask. In most cases, it is less efficient to send the TDO and Mask bits to the POD due to bandwidth limitations unless the POD has an optimized shiftIR/shiftDR and lacks other optimized instructions. However, this functionality is useful at the API level.
• SHIFTDR ? - shift data into data register chain
• CURRENTSTATE Shift-IR
  When doing high speed bit bang or streams, we can't expect the pod to keep track of the state of the TAP controller. Requires too much CPU and the data may bypass the CPU entirely going from USB to FIFO to pins. So, we need a way to tell the pod what state we left the tap controller in.
• STATE desired_state
  Transition to the indicated state. Must be adjacent to current state.
• JTAGRESET - reset JTAG interface using TMS and TCK lines
• BINARY - shift to binary protocol
• ASCII - shift to ascii protocol
• Human interface related: LCD, pushbuttons. Used to wait for operator or for menu interaction.
  • WRITELCD - Send text or graphics to the LCD display
  • WRITELED - Update LED status indicators
  • READBUTTONS (long) - read operator buttons (up to 32)
  • WAITBUTTON (long) - wait for a particular button, or any of the indicated buttons, to be pressed
• On chip debug. First parameter is chip number in chain. Some pods will implement OCD functions for a particular processor. If these are not supported by a pod, they will not be emulated by the pod driver but by a higher level chip driver that layers on top.
• Additional commands for programming devices which require a smart programming algorithm but don't have it implemented on chip. These would basically be a repeat until instruction. Since many pods have limited memory, this should be kept as small as possible.
• File storage commands. In some cases, a pod may have a hard drive, SD card, or other storage for standalone operation or high speed (IJTAG serdes) operation. It might be best to make use of other channels to handle file storage. A USB device can switch to USB mass storage mode. An ethernet device can use TFTP or FTP. And an SD card can simply be placed on a PC. File format could be a format such as STAPL or SVF but it simplifies the POD if the file is simply the same data stream the client would normally send over USB or Ethernet.
• Two modes of operation should be considered. Bidirectional, where, for example, the client sends TDI data to the pod and the pod sends TDO data back and the PC does the checking. Alternatively, in unidirectional mode the client can send TDI, TDO, and mask data and pod can do the comparison. Unidirectional mode requires higher bandwidth but may be less sensitive to latency (though latency issues are already addressed here). Unidirectional mode could also be used as a file format. Unidirectional mode is also preferable for gang programming/testing. Unidirectional mode would not be truly unidirectional as a protocol since the pod would still send back error information. Rather, the distinction refers to the primary flow of bulk data. When sending TDO, TDI, and mask data, it is most efficient to interleave them as three consequetive bytes. Sending All the TDI data, then all the mask, then all the TDO data to the pod is inefficient in terms of memory and cpu usage and doesn't work with pods which have a USB fifo pumping data directly to a CPLD. Interspersing them as three consequetive bits is bad for a pod that uses SPI to accellerate JTAG transfers. A client should be capable of functioning in purely unidirectional mode for the purpose of writing a data file. Also, some JTAG hardware may compute a hash (LFSR) on the returned results; this is useful for gang programming/testing. It can also reduce the bandwidth used even for single device programming. Some such hardware may not deal well with don't care states.

Note that this structure will work for dumb parallel port pods, serial pods, dumb USB pods, smart USB pods, SPI pods, ethernet pods, and other configurations. Code which calls this API can be linked with a stripped down version to embed in a target system for on the fly reprogramming (or field updates). A driver can be written to program a device through the on-chip-debug or serial debugger on any micro, though it will be very slow. The same function names and calling conventions can be used above and below the stream encoder/decoder allowing various functions to be used at various levels (including embedded). This API will work with drivers which are linked as shared libraries/DLL, kernel drivers, standalone programs (pipe stdin/stdout), or TCP/IP deamons. Anywhere you have either a procedure call interface or a binary stream capability. As a demonstration of this, a parallel port driver can be built such that it can be called from a pipe or TCP/IP daemon. In this way, all the non-microcontroller specific code can be debugged without the overhead of running on a target system.

The protocol functions could be divided into three files:

• upstream.c - speaks the protocol
• downstream.c - interprets the protocol (may be embedded)
• common.c - common functions used by both, such as default functions for complex operations that replace with simple operations. Used by both upstream.c and downstream.c.

For operations that function on I/O ports, there should be various word typedefs. High level software will always use a 32 bit word, even for 8 bit ports, so that the same code can talk to 8, 16, and 32 bit micros.

API should allow concurrent access to multiple JTAG streams so that multiple boards can be tested together.

Stack

Multilayered stack (simplified)

• Application layer, provides GUI or command line tool or interface to a debugger
• API layer, handles driver management, etc.
• Chip drivers, implements things like flash programming and on-chip-debug
• JTAG high level functions
• Pod drivers
• Communications drivers: cross platform parallel port access (libparport?), USB access (libusb?), and TCP/IP access

Also, utility functions such as a BSDL parser, SVF/XSVF parser, chip database, etc.

A notation for low level JTAG bit twiddling

Some thoughts on a human readable syntax for jtag commands. What is shown is at a low level, without showing each manipulation of the clock line. This notation could be used for the ASCII level of the protocol above (or equivalent binary commands), for debugging output, and for manual input.

Setup pin assignments
SETUP PIN[0],OUTPUT,TMS
SETUP PIN[1],INPUT,TDO
SETUP PIN[2],OUTPUT,TDI
SETUP PIN[3],OUTPUT,TMS
These lines set a control line without wiggling clock
TDI=0
TDI=1
TMS=0
TMS=1
TCK=0
TCK=1
TRST=0
TRST=1
SRST=0
SRST=1
These next ones clock one or more bits of data on the TMS or TDO line, leaving the other line intact:
TMS{11111}          # JTAG Reset
    # equivalent to TMS=1 TCK=1 TCK=0 TMS=1 TCK=1 TCK=0 TMS=1 TCK=1 TCK=0 TMS=1 TCK=1 TCK=0 TMS=1 TCK=1 TCK=0
TDO{0101010101010101} # a typical vector for shift DR or shift IR modes
   # equivalent to TDO=0 TCK=1 TCK=0 TDO=1 TCK=1 TCK=0 TDO=0 TCK=1 TCK=0 ...
Thus:
TCK=0              # set TCK to zero, ready for next low to high transition
TDI=0              # Set TDI to known state
TMS{11111}    # Test-Logic-Reset
TMS{01100}         # Test-Logic-Reset -> Run-Test/Idle -> Select-DR-Scan -> Select IR Scan -> Capture-IR -> Shift-IR
TMS=0                  # stay in Shift-IR state  (Redundant)
TDI{00001111}     # shift in instruction 00001111
(response 00000001)
TMS{11100}        # Shift-IR ->Exit1-IR -> Update-IR ->Select-DR-Scan -> Capture-DR -> Exit1-DR
TDI{01010101010101010101010101010101}   # shift in data
(response 010001000100101010101010101010001)
TMS{11}           # shift-IR -> exit1-DR -> Update-DR 

Software Compatibility

Compatability with existing software can be accomplished by:

• Modification of application, where source exists
• replacement with a new application
• replacing a DLL the application calls to access pod, such as jungo windrvr
• daemon, such as how openocd talks to gdb
• pod firmware emulation

Use of network mode

The protocol described here could be used to communcate with an ethernet enabled pod. It could also be used to communicate with a server application running on top of a parallel or USB pod. Thus, you could for example download code from your development station while you walk to the lab. This mode could also assist software developers as you can test software using hardware located at a user's site. And since it is designed to be forgiving of latency, you can do this at a considerable distance. A USB over ethernet gateway could be used to debug some pod issues.

POD documentation

A JTAG pod needs the following level of technical documentation to be considered acceptable:

• Full Schematics
• PCB layout in a form suitable for repairs
• Source code to microcontroller firmware. And a binary/hex copy.
• Source code to any programable logic devices (CPLD, FPGA, etc). And a "binary" copy that can be used to reprogram the device
• Documentation for the protocol used
• Driver source code

When you withhold important technical documentation, you are hurting your customers more than your competitors.

Database

We need to start a public domain database with:

• JTAG chip ID
• Vendor name
• Part number
• Package
• Function
• Link to BSDL file. Including path within zip file, if needed.
• Link to IBIS file
• Link to spice file
• Link to Verilog behavioral model
• Link to VHDL behavioral model
• Link to product page
• Link to datasheet
• Link to open symbol library symbols (schematic/footprint), used by smart graphical interfaces to show pin activity, faults, etc. (I haven't done the file formats yet)

Other ISP/On chip debug protocols

Those developing jtag pods may wish to support some of these.

Freescale BDM

This is an open collector one wire protocol used on HSC12, 9S12, and coldfire CPUs. BDM is documented. Timing is problematic for bit banged software implementations. A brief description (from memory): the speed of the protocol depends on the clock rate (PLL not XTAL) the cpu is using. At 16Mhz, the pod generates a 1 Mhz clock rate which is modulated to 25% or 75% duty cycle to send ones and zeros. When it is time for the processor to send a response, the pod generates pulses with 25% duty cycle and the processor selectively stretches them to 75%. There are timeouts that further complicate matters. The BDM pulse frequency is 1/16th of the CPU clock. When sending, you pull the line low for 3 or 4 cycles to send a 1 or 12 or 13 cycles to send a 0. The pin is sampled on the 10th cycle. You have up to 512 cycles after the start of the last pulse to send the next pulse before the CPU times out so the minimum frequency is about 31.250Khz at 16Mhz. The file S12BDMV4.pdf in the 9S12DP512 Zipped Datasheets documents one variant of this protocol. BDM normally uses a 2x3 pin (0.100") male header on the circuit board:

     BKGD  1 2  GND
           3 4  RESET
           5 6  VCC

Note that programming a FT232R in RS-232 serial mode might let you interact with BDM (with an external resistor) at some clock rates. Sending the character FF will send a 1 clock pulse, FE a two clock, FC, 3 clock, F8, 4 clock, etc. So setting the baud rate to 1/4 the cpu frequency and sending FF and FC characters (and receiving similar characters) might be a way to bit bang the data across.

AVR Debugwire and ISP

debugWIRE is a one pin (RESET) debugging protocol used on some ATMEL 8 bit AVR microcontrollers. It is disabled by default and must be enabled using ISP. Atmel does not publish the debugwire protocol (only the protocol used to talk to their debug pods).

  (TDO) MISO  1 2 VCC  (VTref)
  (TCK) SCK   3 4 MOSI  (TDI)
  (nSRST)RESET 5 6 GND   (GND)

Signal names in parenthesis are the line on the JTAG10PIN connector these signals are wired to when adapting a JTAGICE MKII to use ISP/debugwire on a 6 pin connector.

Many AVR micros can be reprogrammed using the SPI port while reset is held low. It appears that in ISP programming mode, the on chip SPI is in slave mode and thus the directions of the MOSI and MISO pins are reversed from application mode.Alternatively, RESET may be pulled up to 12V for high voltage programming (faster?). It is likely that these pins are used for other purposes on the board so you might have to fight with other drivers (hopefully with series resistors).

It appears that the ISP protocol is used for programming only and the debugwire protocol is used for debugging only.

Microchips PIC protocol

This is apparently a nightmare as the specs are not released and they change drastically from chip to chip.

Dallas One wire protocol

This protocol is not an ISP protocol. It is normally used to communcate with sensors and other one wire devices.

Pods

Xilinx platform cable USB

Some folks have made modified code to run on the version of this cable that is built into some starter kits. Nobody seems to by the standalone cable, for obvious reasons. xup and the ixo usb_jtag projects are ones that have downloaded modified code. The code is pretty primative and slow.

system tck pin 66 system tms pin 67 system tdi pin 68 system tdo pin 27 cypress tck pin 17 cypress tms pin 18 cypress tdi pin 29 cypress tdo pin 49

Chips

This section lists some chips which can be used to make USB JTAG pods.

FTDI FT232RL

Dumb USB-to-serial adapter (full speed) with bit bang mode. Very low total parts count, just a few external caps and the connectors. Internal crystal. Internal USB resistors. Internal configuration eeprom. 1.5V-5V VCCIO. Lacks the multiprotocal serial engine of the FT232RL so you can't send 8 bits per byte and instead need to send two bytes per.

FTDI FT2232D

Dumb dual port USB-to-serial adapter (full speed) with bit bang mode. 16 times faster than the FT232RL. Needs external serial configuration eeprom, external crystal, and more caps than the FT232RL. 5V/3.3V IO so level converters are needed.

Atmel AT91SAM7XC256

USB full speed, ethernet MAC (requires external PHY), 48MIPS? ARM7 32 bit core, SPI, JTAG TAP You could probably acheive around 3.2Mhz bidirection or 6.4Mhz single directional (ignoring TDO) without compression (USB bus limited) and maybe faster with compression, depending on the operation. Using ethernet, should be able to achieve 25Mbps. By switching a jumper, you can activate an internal boot program that allows downloading by USB, among other sources. Requires around 32 external components including voltage regulator, crystal, decoupling caps, USB resistors, PLL filter, JTAG connector, JTAG pullup resistors, USB connector, and jumpers (TST, ERASE, JTAGSEL) to make a basic USB micro before you add the application specific stuff (level translation) assuming you want full download/debug capability via JTAG and USB. Additional components, including PHY and connector, required for ethernet.

AVR32 UC3A chips

32 bit CPU, USB on-the-go full speed, ethernet MAC, 512K flash, 80 Drystone MIPS, AVR32 core, SPI, peripherals similar to SAM7

Cypress EZ USB FX2LP CY7C64713, CY7C64714

USB full speed, 8051 core, lacks JTAG TAP, lacks on chip debug, 16K RAM, no flash (program has to be downloaded from PC every time unless you use external RAM, Internal USB endpoint FIFOs, I/O FIFO with state machine

Port GPIO Master    Slave    Other
---- ---- ------    -------  ---------
SCL                          (I2C)
SDA                          (I2C)
D+                           (USB)
D-                           (USB)
XTALIN                       (oscillator)
XTALOUT                      (oscillator)
RESET#                       
WAKEUP#
PE0/T0OUT
PE1/T1OUT
IFCLK                        external 5-48mhz FIFO Clock (or uses internal 30/48Mhz clock
CLKOUT                       8051 clock (osc PLL divided down)

?         RDY0      SLRD    read strobe for fifo in slave mode
?         RDY1      SLWR    write strobe for fifo in slave mode

?         CTL0      FLAGA
?         CTL1      FLAGB
?         CTL2      FLAGC

PA0  GPIO                    INT0# interrupt
PA1  GPIO                    INT1# interrupt
PA2  GPIO GPIO      SLOE     fifo handshake? (page 113)
PA3  GPIO GPIO      GPIO     WU2 Power mangement (page 89)
PA4  GPIO GPIO      FIFOADR0 fifo handshake?
PA5  GPIO GPIO      FIFOADR1 fifo handshake?
PA6  GPIO GPIO      PKTEND   fifo handshake?
PA7  GPIO GPIO      PA7/FLAGD/SLCS# fifo handshake?

PB0  GPIO FD[0]     FD0[0]   (fifo data)
PB1  GPIO FD[1]     FD0[1]   (fifo data)
PB2  GPIO FD[2]     FD0[2]   (fifo data)
PB3  GPIO FD[3]     FD0[3]   (fifo data)
PB4  GPIO FD[4]     FD0[4]   (fifo data)
PB5  GPIO FD[5]     FD0[5]   (fifo data)
PB6  GPIO FD[6]     FD0[6]   (fifo data)
PB7  GPIO FD[7]     FD0[7]   (fifo data)

PD0  GPIO FD[8]     FD0[8]   (fifo data)
PD1  GPIO FD[9]     FD0[9]   (fifo data)
PD2  GPIO FD[10]    FD0[10]  (fifo data)
PD3  GPIO FD[11]    FD0[11]  (fifo data)
PD4  GPIO FD[12]    FD0[12]  (fifo data)
PD5  GPIO FD[13]    FD0[13]  (fifo data)
PD6  GPIO FD[14]    FD0[14]  (fifo data)
PD7  GPIO FD[15]    FD0[15]  (fifo data)

100 and 128 pin packages provide two additional ports

Use T0OUT to drive IFCLK? Auto reload division up to divide by 255, otherwise manual reload needed. Prescaled by 4 or 12 giving 12 or 4 Mhz which is a bit slow for full speed jtag. Maybe we can program the GPIF state machine to make a higher clock from the 48Mhz clock? Chip lacks SPI which could be used for fast programmed I/O. Connecting SLWR to tck may be helpful in using pod to snoop a JTAG interface. May not have individual data direction control on the FIFO data lines, which is a real problem. Not sure we can use two fifos, one for input and one for output. Indeed the FIFO looks really limited for such applications. There is no SPI to allow data to be clocked out by hardware 8 bits at a time. You can see why people use a CPLD with this chip.

It looks like 25Mhz would be possible with this chip with an external CPLD to drive two internal FIFOs in slave mode. Without the CPLD, you aren't going to get anywhere close. Despite the fancy programable state machine, this chip is a dog. The fact that it uses an 8051 core was your first clue.

Cypress EZ USB FX1 CY7C68013a

Same as the FX2 only limited to USB full speed.

NXP LPC2888

(sampling) 1MB Flash, USB high speed, 64K RAM, ARM7TDMI 60Mhz, JTAG OCD but no JTAG boundary scan?,

MC9S12UF32

USB high speed, 32Kx8 flash, 3.5Kx8 RAM +1.5K for USB fifos, 64-LQFP or 100-LQFP, about $9 digikey, 8bit HCS12 CPU, similar chip with ethernet but no USB availible. No JTAG. BDM used for debugging. Controllers for SD, compact flash, IDE, etc. 3.3V/5V I/O. UART but no SPI, though the SD card port might support SPI. NOPE, SD controller does not support SPI though it may have the 4 bit equivalent. Operation up to 20Mhz. Queue controller for transfering data to peripherals. Does not appear to have ability to load firmware over USB. However, once the device has been programed once with a boot loader, this could be done (I have written such a loader for non-usb versions of this chip).

ST STM32F103VBT6

ARM Cortex 32 bit CPU, 128K Flash, 20K RAM, USB full speed, two ADC, seven timers, 2xI2C, 3xUAR, 2 SPI (18Mhz), CAN, no ethernet, LQFP100, JTAG, serial wire debug (SWD), $9 digikey, smaller versions available. Does not support flash programming via USB unless you have previously installed a bootloader via JTAG. Five 16 bit GPIO ports with haphazard pinout.

NXP LPC2888

ARM7TDMI microcontroller with 1MB flash, 64KB RAM, USB High Speed $12.64 digikey, no ethernet. Dual DAC, Dual ADC, No SPI? but has SD/MMC card interface. No PWM? Only available in BGA (3 rows of balls). Samples only. Webmaster needs to be taken out and shot: JAVA, FLASH, unauthorized opening of windows, content is a mess.

NXP LPC2468

My Personal JTAG Projects

As time and resources allow, I am working on a ton of JTAG related projects. They are highly interdependent so they are being done in parallel.

Mini JTAG pod

I have designed a very simple compact FT232RL based JTAG adapter. 1.5? to 5V. No PCB yet. Probably be around 400kbps. May be USB flash drive sized.

FPGA based pod

The pod logic can be programmed into a FPGA for very high performance.

JTAG software suite

As described here

A bunch of boards with JTAG TAP ports. Micros, FPGA, CPLD, I/O boards, etc.

Level Translation

One of the big issues in making a JTAG pod is level translation. The state of level translation ICs leaves a LOT to be desired. You would think that there would be a lot of chips that you could apply 1.2-5V power and logic on port A and 1.2-5V (or 0V) power and logic on port B. Well, that isn't the case. Many level translators assume that one power bus will always be higher than the other. You also need to deal with hot plugging where signal lines might get connected before Vref. And you can have any combination of the POD and the target being powered up or down. TI has a voltage translator selection application note that is informative; it would be more useful if there were actually good parts to choose from. Pullup resistors should not be used to pull the output of a driver higher than its supply voltage. Also, many level translators don't work at 5V. Many level translators have output enable or direction signals but don't be surprised if the input is connected to the wrong supply voltage. Many 5V devices have TTL not CMOS levels, which must be taken into account when doing voltage translation. Very few translators go from 1.2 to 5V on either port, let alone both ports with either VCC higher. And good luck finding a suitable part that also has a second source.

Maxim has a level translation tips though not adequate for a serious pod.

A typical JTAG pod might have 3.3V logic and need to interface to 1.2 to 5V logic. This means the other side of the translator could have higher or lower supply voltage. If the POD uses 5V logic, conversion may be simpler.

The state of single directional voltage translation leaves enough to be desired; when dealing with bidirectional signals it gets worse. Bit programmable bidirectional signals, such as would be found on a GPIO port or on a JTAG pod that allows flexible pin assignments, are particularly problematic for level translation. It is one thing to translate a bidirectional signal when you have a direction signal to work with and another when the translator has to guess. Suppose you have a high level on a port A input. Is it high because the micro drove it high or is it high because the translator is driving it high because it thinks port B is being driven high. Voltage clamps with passive pullups don't have this problem but they have the usual issues with pullups.

• 74LVC1G125 - single gate tristate driver, in 5 pin packages. About $0.29 qty 1 at digikey. Input is either 3.3V or 5V, supply voltage 1.65 to 5.5V. Problem is, you need to stuff a lot of parts. When having a board assembled, you pay for each part placed plus setup charges for each unique part.
• 74LVC125 - you might expect it to act like a quadd 74LVC1G125 except supply voltage is limited to 3.6V and some are limited on the low end as well.
• TI 1G99 is a single gate 8 pin device with 60 functions intended to reduce inventory. 1G97 and 1G98 have 9 functions and 6 pins. Not a programable device, it is a 4 input device with a fixed transfer function and you select the logic function based on how you tie the inputs. The LVC version works from 1.65 to 5V and has 5V tolerant inputs. Good for high to low translation, not so good for low to high though it may do 3.3V to 5V. There are however versions with voltage suffixes that might have fixed thresholds. 1T97 and 1T98 translator versions availible (3.6V max).
• 74LVC2T45, 74LCV2T45-1.8V, 74LVC2T45-2.5V, 74LVC2T46-3.3V, 74LVC2T45-5V. Dual gate (1T versions also available) dual supply translators. Samples only as of this writing except for the one with no suffix. "Fully Configurable Dual-Rail Design Allows Each Port to Operate Over the Full 1.65-V to 5.5-V Power-Supply Range". Dual bidirectional bus transceiver with common DIR signal. 74Mbps tranlating to 1.8V, faster for higher voltages. Goes into isolation mode when either power supply is lost.
• FET clamp bus switches and Translation Voltage Clamps(TI). These are an array of symetrical fets with the gates all tied together and matched gate threshold voltages. The two busses are connected to source and drain. Voltage in either direction is clamped to the gate voltage minus the gate threshold. Either a simple external analog circuit (resistors) or an internal circuit is used to set the gate voltage. One FET is used as a reference. Internal circuits usually require one supply voltage to be less than the other. SN74TVC3010 (10 fets) and SN74TVC16222A are examples of the external bias type. One or two fewer signals than fets. These types of devices can also be used to isolate buses from each other. These are fast (Tpd 4ns) and bidirectional but when translating low to high need pullups and are only driven part of the way up before the pullup has to take over. To pass 5V through with no clamping requires an elevated supply. Versions are availible that can be connected in ways not shown on the datasheet to support any combination between 0v - 5V on either port; hint: use built in FETs for the reference circuit instead of one. If you also use a serial resistor (or the target board has one for protection), the series resistor and the pullup form a voltage divider that can give you less than ideal logic low levels. If you are receiving a signal from a driver with an active pullup but a passive pull down, it isn't going to interact well with your pullups. In any case, pullup resistors lower your input impedence. These parts can be useful for translation on a GPIO port where you have no direction signal availible. Maxim also has a variation on this. called a signal protector, with three fets in series that will protect signals to+/-40? volts; about 100 ohm series resistance and requres extra supply voltages such as +7.5V and -2.5V to bias the fets. The NXP GTL2000 looks like a pin compatible replacement for the SN74TVC16222A and the GTL2010 looks to be a pin compatible replacement for the SN74TVC16222A.
• FET clamps with boosters. boosters can get confused about who is asserting what signal and friends have had bad things to say about such devices. ST2378E is one example, but it suffers from the requrement that VCCA > VCCB. Only 13Mhz.
• bus hold type design made bidirectional, with boosters. Suppose you want to keep a bus from floating when tristated. You connect the bus to the inputs of a buffer and you connect the output of the buffer through a resistor back to the bus. Thus, the bus will be driven at whatever level it was last at until forced to another state. Put two suitable buffers with resisotrs back to back and you have a slow bidirectional voltage translator. To get around the speed, you add booster circuits (one shots with stronger drive). ADG3308 is an example. The MAX3000/3001/3002/3003 are this type, also availible in unidirectional (fixed number in each direction), but output drive is very weak (6k ohm) except when a transition occurs; 1.2 to 5.5V, some parts up to 20Mbps.
• Open drain drivers with higher voltage tolerance on outputs. Unidirectional, requires pullups.
• Analog switches. The TI LVC1G66 is a single analog switch that runs on 1.65 to 5.5V, 2ns propagation delay and 5.5 ohm on resistance. TI SN74LVC1G3157 is a SPDT analog switch, 1.65V to 5.5V, input up to 5.5V regardless of VCC (5V tolerant), Vih is 70% of VCC.
• ATE pin drivers. Fairly expensive.
• Overvoltage tolerant inputs with a suitable threshold. I have also used a logic level fet as an input translator but it does invert the signal. Getting a threshold that matches a range of logic levels can be tricky.
• Some CPLDs can work fairly well for level translation applications and provide additional functionality as well. However, they are typically limited to translating up or down one knotch. I.E. a 3.3V device such as an XC9500XL family device may work with 5V, 3.3V, and 2.5V but not 1.2V and a 2.5V device may work with 1.2V, 2.5V, and 3.3V but not 5V. Some CPLDs have separate supply voltages for different I/O ports and some are simply tolerant of higher and lower levels. XAPP785 describes level translation using the coolrunner family (3.3V max).
• Series resistors. Slow or low impedence issues. When using series resistors to down convert, make sure the device being driven has clamping diodes and that there is actually enough load on Vcc that the diodes can safely dump the current (the load on VCC may be negligable except when switching).
• Comparators, Op amps, and differential receivers. Microchip TB013 has an example of using opamps and transistors to drive a signal.
• Application specific translators such as SIM/smart card shifters. The MAX1840/MAX1841 are unusual in that they do not require that one VCC be always less than the other. Not enough I/Os, though. They have two drivers and one fet clamped bidirectional line.

Also consider whether you should have opto-isolators

Nuisance Patents

Nuisance patents can be a problem. A search for "JTAG" at the patent office lists 3136 patents. Many of those may have little to do with JTAG and simply cover a device that happens to include JTAG but there are probably a lot of patents that should never have been issued. All of the patents I have looked at were patently ridiculous. Consider, for example, #7265578, which covers programming a non-jtag SPI memory by manipulating the JTAG addressable pins on an FPGA. Obviously, the patent office didn't ask any test engineers if this was "Sufficiently obvious to anyone trained in the art" or they would have been rolling on the floor laughing. It is also extremely inefficient; if you think programming a parallel flash this way is slow, wait till you try doing an SPI flash.

Which JTAG cable should I get

In the short run, this may be determined by the software you want to use. If you are stuck with a proprietary app, you may have a limited choice of cables, none of which are satisfactory. Using proprietary vendor software, you are pretty much stuck with a separate pod for each brand of chip you use, which is completely unaccepatable. If you are using third party proprietary software, you may have a bit more choice. In the long term, you want a cable with schematics, protocol documentation, and preferably micro firmware and CPLD source where applicable. A pinout matching your board is also a consideration if you don't want to make an adapter or use flying leads.

Xilinx Impact software is proprietary trash. The only USB cable it supports doesn't work with other software. If you are using Xilinx Impact, you should probably use a parallel III compatible cable as these are the only ones supported by both Xilinx and open source software. Long term, look at ditching impact or just use it to generate .bit or .svf files. Impact uses the Jungo Windriver which not only causes lots of problems on linux, it is a gigantic security hole (it allows user space access to PCI devices, allowing an intruder to write to protected memory). An open source project has replaced the windriver, with some support from xilinx. But it only is able to emulate a parallel port cable so there are severe latency issues if you were to try to interface a USB cable that way.

Avoid supporting products without technical documentation as this is supporting reprehensible business practices and it will cause you all manner of trouble.

The digilent JTAG3 parallel cable is cheap and has schematics which can be downloaded. There is no micro, programmable logic, or protocol to need documenting. If your next computer doesn't have a parallel port, it will be useless. It does not support TRST or SRST. It supposedly works from 1.5 to 5V, although drive on TDO might be rather weak if you use a low voltage JTAG device. Compatible with a xilinx parallel cable and supported by most open source software.

The digilent USB cable is proprietary crap but the protocol has been reverse engineered.

The AVR ICE and AVR ICE MKII USB pods have documented protocols. There is also an inexpensive clone on ebay. Won't work with impact but may work with open source alternatives.

The Amontec JTAGkey and JTAGkey tiny are almost documented. No schematics (at least on the website) but they are based on the FT2232 chip, come with openocd driver source, etc. Won't work with impact but may work with open source alternatives depending on what you are trying to do.

The xilinx platform cable USB is a train wreck. All technical documentation is withheld. Don't buy it. If you got stuck with the embedded version on the Spartan 3E development board, there is a project that downloads replacement EZ-USB FX2 firmware and CPLD firmware to it so it can be used with other software though this is a skeleton implementation and is at least 4x slower than the vendor supplied firmware.

There are a variety of parallel wiggler or parallel cable III clones. Quality varies. Some are unbuffered.

ASIX PRESTO requires external level translators, lacks sufficient technical documentation online, but does work with openocd and supports a variety of devices.

Olimex ARM-USB-OCD and JTAG USB OCD Tiny (available from sparkfun in the US), works with open OCD. Unlike olimex development board products, schematics are lacking.

At the time of this writing, OpenOCD supports parallel port wigglers, FT2232 based devices, Amontec JAG accellerator, Amontec JTAGkey, Amontec JTAGkey tiny, Olimexx ARM-USB-OCD, everve signalyzer, ASIX presto, and USBJTAG.

Semiconductor Manufacturer's BSDL files

Ok, guys. There is a right way to distribute BSDL files. If you are a visitor who works for a semiconductor company, check if your site is in compliance. Access should be provided in each of three locations (and no login should be required):

• Link to the files on each product's main page.
• A single, or small number, of archive files (.zip) containing all the BSDL files for all of your products. Used for bulk import into JTAG software.
• A page which links to all the BSDL files for all of your products.
• A .csv (comma separrated values) file or similar format with JTAG ID, Chip number, Package, URL to 1149 bsdl file, and URL to 1532 BSDL file

BSDL files should be available as an individual file which can be hyperlinked to and as part of an archive. And please use a sensible extension, i.e. ".bsdl". ".txt" is a bad idea.

A lot of defective search engines on semicondoctor manufacturer sites that only return about 10 pages at a time.

A google search of the form "site:www.actel.com filetype:bsd OR filetype:bsdl OR filetype:bsm" may return useful results. google doesn't seem to handle filetype:zip well at all. "STD_1149_1_2001 OR STD_1149_1_1994 OR STD_1149_1_1990 OR STD_1532_2002" might help Or ' "use STD_1149_1_2001.all" OR "use STD_1149_1_1994.all" OR "use STD_1149_1_1990.all" OR "use STD_1532_2002.all"'.

Xilinx

Home Page. BSDL Files are distributed as Zip files for each family. Xilinx login required. Most Xilinx programable logic devices support JTAG.

Altera

Atmel

Actel

Home Page. Individual BSDL Files can be downloaded. They appear to be outdated 1149.1 files and at least one was missing the required "use STD_1149..." statement. Power pins are included in pin map but not identified as such.

National Semiconductor

AMD

Intel

Freescale

Semtech

TI/burr-brown

Maxim/DALLAS

Analog Devices

Linear Technologies

No BSDL files found.

Cypress

NXP/Philips/VLSI Tech

Intersil/Xicor/Harris

Broadcom

Conexant/Brooktree/Rockwell

Via

Fairchild

Genesys Logic

Genesis Microchip

Avago/Agilent/HP

Hitachi

Holtek

Hynix/Hyundai/LG

IBM Microelectronics

IDT

Infineon/Siemens

Micronas/ITT

Lattice

LSI Logic

Luminary Micro

Micrel

Microchip

Micron

Zarlink/Mitel

Mitsubishi

Mosel Vitelic

NEC

OKI

ON Semiconductor

OPTi

PLX Technology

PMC Sierra

Quick Logic

Rabbit Semiconductor

Renesas

Samsung

SST

ST Microelectronics

SiS

Sipex/Exar

TDK

Toshiba

ZMD

Zoran

Zetex

Yamaha

Digikey Parts

List does not include many micros, programable logic, pods, or development boards with a few exceptions

• Fairchild SCANPSC110FSC JTAG multiplexor, around $11
• Micros, CPLDs, FPGAs. To many to list
• $16 buffered buffered JTAG cable with schematic. (kit?). Apparently also availible as part of DKTGALL-KIT $42 which also includes an $11 DKTGUSBPOWER-KIT-ND USB to 5V, 3.3V 2.5V, 1.8V power source, $7 DKTGRS232CRS-232 to serial converter, and a crude $8 DKTGHILOTEST-KIT logic probe.
• SN74LVT8986PM addressable scan port ( 3 port mux) $11.20
• SCANPSC110FSC JTAG Multiplexor$11.31, SCANSTA110 and SCANSTA11
• SCANSTA476 JTAG voltage monitor $5.35
• SCAN90CP02 2x2 LVDS crosspoint switch with 1149.6 support $5.86. AN1313 discusses 1149.1 and 1149.6 features of the chip, including stuck at fault simulation. The stuck at fault simulation is a bit like normal boundary scan except that you can choose between normal operation or JTAG mode on a pin by pin basis. Three new instructions SA_PERLOAD, SA, and SA_BYPASS.
• SCAN921821 $13.30 qty 1. Dual 18Bit Serializer with JTAG and some special high speed BIST with two extra TAP pins. FBGA. SCAN92102H ? serializer SCAN921226H ? deserializer. Still only 800Mbps which is slower than a number of popular buses.
• Many TI boundary scan register ICs.

Application notes

National Semiconductor

• AN-1313 SCAN90CP02 Design for Test Features
• AN-1340 Simplified Programming of Xilinx Devices using a SCANSTA111/112 JTAG Chain Mux.
• Application Brief 121 Application Brief 121 - Partition IEEE 1149.1 SCAN Vhains for Manageability
• AN-1327 Simplified Programming of Altera FPGA's using a SCANSTA111/112 Scan Chain Mux

Xilinx

• XAPP104 A Quick JTAG ISP Checklist
• XAPP424 Embeded JTAG ACE Player
• XAPP141 In-System Programming Times for XC9500XL
• XAPP544 Using Xilinx XCF02S/XCF04S JTAG Proms for Data Storage Applicatons
• XAPP343 In-System Programming of XPLA3 devices
• AR#1272 How many devices can a Parallel Cable III program in a chain? (Answer: 7 due to 5K pullups on TS pin).
• Etc.

TI

• JTAG Scan Educator

Misc Tips

• If you design a device with all I/O signals bidirectional, then all I/O ports on one board may be connected to all I/O ports on another for testing. If you design it appropriately, one port on your board can also be looped back to another port for testing.

Books

• The Boundary Scan Handbook, 2003, 3rd edition, Kenneth P. Parker [google books] [amazon $101] Older editions: The Boundary Scan Handbook and The Boundary Scan Handbook: Analog and digital. (I have an older edition).
• The In-System Configuration Handbook: A Designer's Guide to ISC, 2003, Neil G. Jacobson [Amazon: $107] (I have this edition)
• IEEE STD 1149.1-2001 IEEE Standard Test Access Port and Boundary-Scan Architecture $113 print, $98 pdf at techstreet. Oddly, this came up too under the same number: Standard Testability Method for Embedded Core-based Integrated circuits $105 print, $90 PDF at techstreet
• IEEE STD 1149.4-1999 IEEE Standard for a Mixed-Signal Test Bus $102 print, $89 PDF at techstreet
• IEEE STD 1149.6-2003 IEEE Standard for Boundary-Scan Testing of Advanced Digital Networks $91 Print, $79 PDF at techstreet
• IEEE STD 1149.5 IEEE Standard for Module Test and Maintenance Bus (MTM-Bus) Protocol WITHDRAWN $154 print, $134 PDF, $75 paperback
• IEEE STD 1532-2002 IEEE Standard for In-System Configuration of Programmable Devices $106 print, $92 PDF at techstreet
• IEEE 1149.1 (JTAG) Testability Primer (144 page book) (free download).

IEEE members can probably get the standard cheeper through IEEE. Standards also available from global engineering documents.

Articles and Papers

• Extensions to 1149.1 Boundary-scan Standard (EDN). 3-1/2 page intro to 1149.4, 1149.6, and 1532.
• IEEE 1149.6 - A Practical Perspective
• Tutorial: Implementing and Using 1149.4 (92 slides)

Links

• missiontech
• uClinux has JTAG info
• JTAG Toolkit (GPL)
• Blackfin JTAG Tools (zlib/libpng license)
• Openwince JTAG Tools (GPL)
• Xilinx
• Digilent , the designers of some of the Xilinx starter kits, has FPGA and CPLD boards, JTAG3 parallel cable, a proprietary undocumented USB JTAG cable with Windows only drivers (CY7C68013 based), 6 pin to 6 pin cables, 6 pin to flying lead cables.
• FTDI has the FT2232 chip, a dual async serial/parallel fifo chip that has bit bang and SPI modes suitable for driving JTAG ports. They have JTAG libraries for Linux and Windows. DIP modules with the chip on it are availible through mouser electronics.
• Amontec jtagkey is an FTDI FT2232 based USB to JTAG key with open source linux drivers as well as windows and Wince drivers. 6Mhz JTAG speed. Throughput 5.6Mhz?
• Wikipedia JTAG page.
• JTAG-ARM9
• Xilinx XAPP058 describesn C source code to program an FPGA using XSVF files on an 8051 micro. The SVF/XSVF formats described the JTAG operations needed to do the programming. Also contains a concise summary of how to program xilinx CPLDs and FPGAs via JTAG.
• Xilinx XAPP500 describes J-Drive software ( Source Code ) which uses the configuation information in 1532 BSDL files to program FPGAs, CPLDs, and Flash memories.
• Xilinx IEEE 1532 BSDL files
• Alteraa BSDL Support page
• Actel has a BSDL file format discription (based on 1149.1 rather than 1532)
• Review of Boundary Scan is a slide presentation but it includes some BNF
• AC Boundary-scan Specification for IEEE has some BNF
• IEEE Std 1149.1-2001
• Xilinx: ISP Standards and Specifications
• Agilent IEEE BSDL chapter of their boundary scan guide has some BNF, and includes the STD_1149_1_1994 VHDL package. Part of their 3070 boundary scan guide
• Xilinx BSDL files from their ftp server. Includes some, such as CPLDs, that they neglect to link to from their web pages.
• Xilinx AR# 11857 Provides a brief description of how jtag devices on a chain are identified.
• OpenJTAG
• Automatic JTAG pinout detection
• FJtag project at sourceforge is a GPLed JTAG GUI front end with BSDL import, seems to have been orphaned.
• usbprog 3.0 - Euro$32 partially assembled AVR ISP 2 clone kit with OpenOCD (ARM) interface, USB CDC compliant TTL serial I/O, AT89 programmer, etc. based on the ATmega32 and a USBN9604 parallel bus interface USB controller. 100ohm resistors instead of level converters. 10 pin JTAG connector. See also the octopus, a minimal microcontroller with drivers to make onboard devices (SPI, I2C, PWM, UART, A/D, 32 digital I/O) appear as linux devices.
• avrdude was originally a SPI ISP (not JTAG) program for the AVR CPUs. Although these processors are not JTAG, the 4 pin SPI style interface could easily be twiddled with a JTAG device that allows bitbanging. Also, this software includes support for many devices including some which are JTAG. GPL.
• OpenWrt JTAG cable page has schematics for a wiggler clone (3.3V).
• Debrick utility for WRT54G router
• Many Atmel devices do not have proper JTAG IDs. Also, in debug mode the port behaves differently. Better to keep atmel cpu's in a separate chain.
• AVR060 : JTAG ICE communications protocol (8-bit AVR pod)
• Atmel AVR067 : JTAGICE mkII communications protocol (8-bit AVR pod)
• AVR ISP schematics
• Elmicro AVR-JTAG-USB
• JTAG at hardwarehacking.com
• usbjtag - FT2232 based prototypes. Uses ADuM1401BRW for level shifting and electrical isolation (limits speed to 3Mhz) and does not tristate SRST/TRST. Also has pictures of Joern Kaipf's OOCD-Link.
• Joern Kaipf's OOCD-Link. There are two or three versions of this board, with different level shifter configurations. He is also working on another version with a FT232R and an AT91SAM7
• TI has a $20 USB Flash drive size ISP which connects to tiny 2012 development boards ($10/3) that fit inside the flash drive. 2KB flash, 128 byte RAM.
• Spark Fun sells the Olimex FT2232 based ARM-USB-OCD with 20 pin connector for $72, 2V-5V, OpenOCD support, RS232 port, and target power supply. They also sell the ARM-USB-AVR which emulates a JTAGICE and has a 10 pin (2x5). Also, the olimex JTAG USB OCD Tini for $52. And the olimex MSP-JTAG-ISO Optoisolated JTAG for TI MSP430xx processors, 14 pin (2x7) JTAG and another USB JTAG for MSP430 without optoisolation for $72.
• The Intersil CD22M3494MQZ 16x8 analog switch ($9 digikey) has potential for making a JTAG pod which adapts to different connector pinouts. 50 ohm typical on resistance. Similar products mitel M3494 and SGS MT8816.
• XILINX JTAG tools on Linux without proprietary kernel modules Permisive license. Xilinx Platform USB (including version on some spartan boards), Xilinx parallel cable IV (in Parallel III compat mode), Enterpoint Prog2 (Parallel III clone), Trenz TE0149-01 (Parallel III clone), Digilent JTAG3 (Parallel III clone), Amontec JTAGkey-Tiny. Works with ISE Webpack, ChipScope Pro, EDK, synplicity Identify debugger. Xilinx is beta testing the open source drivers. Note, however, that this only does the low level port access stuff; it doesn't speak the xilinx protocol. But it does make it possible to use FTDI chips with xilinx ISE (write only).
• Maxim Appnote 3339 Using the TINI JTAG Library and SVF file to program Xilinx Prom devices (VAVA)
• Xilinx DS097 : Xilinx Parallel Cable IV Product Specification
• Xilinx JTAG/Parallel Download Cable Drawing - The real deal from xilinx. uses two 74HC125 chips.
• Catapult EJ-1 Ethernet JTAG pod ($500)
• JTAG Base Layer - A defunct? project at creating a JTAG library.
• XUP - an open source (well GPL) driver for the Xilinx Platform CableUSB, or at least the version embedded in some development cards.
• ACTEL BSDL files Format Description
• VHDL tools that might be of some use in parsing BSDL:
  • VHDL grammar in ANTLR - non-commercial license
  • HDLmaker (BSD License)
  • signs (BSD license, java)
  • savant (LGPL license) SCRAMportion includes a VHDL analizer based on the Purdue Compiler Construction Tool Set
  • FreeHDL (GPL)
  • Hyperlinked VHDL-93 BNF syntax - There is also a YACC/LEX grammer in the same directory "This file is intended not to be used for commercial purposes without permsiion ....". The yacc file mentions some problems with VHDL not being LR(1).
  • FJtag (GPL license) has a BSDL parser.
  • vhdl-parser.tar.Z - vhdl parser in prolog "Copyright 1990 by the Microelectronics Center of North Carolina", license unknown.
  uc_vhdlgrammar - license unknown, contains portions from a public domain Ada grammar, 1990 file, no copyright.
  • comp.lang.vhdl FAQ - lists some vhdl parsers.
  • VHDL PArser/Generator written in Prolog (comp.lang.vhdl FAQ says public domain)
  • Hardware-vhdl-Parser-011 PERL module (Perl license)
  • bsdl2jtag.pl is a BSDL parser written in perl. GPL. 1149.1 dialect.
  • J-Drive may include a BSDL parser.
  • The boundary-scan handbook at google books, has the first page of the BNF.
  • Hamburg VHDL archive has links to online books on VHDL, draft versions of the VHDL standards, etc.
  • VHDL93_HTML VHDL-3 Parser in SWI-Prolog - Has an html description of grammar (broken filename, extract as a compressed tar archive).
• IEEE Std P1532 presentation
• Mentor graphics boundary scan process guide
• The in System Configuration Handbook: A Designer's Guide to Isc (google books)
• Cypress AN6077 has information on implementing an 8 bit async interface with an EZ-USB FX2LP. EZ-USB techncial reference manual contains more info than the datasheet.
• Linux ez-usb gives some examples of sending usb packets with usb robot
• usb-robot Allows you to send usb commands
• voladya fx2_programmer tools for use with ez-usb chips. Upload/download ram, bulk read of endpoint, benchmark
• urjtag This program aims to create a universal JTAG library, server, and tools. GPL and LGPL. Hasn't released any files but there is stuff in subversion.
• Paul Reynolds' list of semiconductor companies. Includes a incomplete list by category, too.
• Chip Directory
• onTAP USB to JTAG pod ($400) (Xilinx platform USB pinout compatible) and software ($2900) brochure
• Asset Interteh sells ScanWorks software. Since they don't bother to post prices on their website, I won't bother to create a link.
• The Xilinx Tagalyzer, described in XAPP103 can be connected at any point in a scan chain and display the TAP controller state on LEDs. Uses an XC9536 CPLD demo card.
• xilprg replaces cblsrv for Xilinx impact, works with Parallel III or digilent USB cable (reverse engineerd). LGPL. Probably VERY slow with impact since it emulates a parallel cable to that software and thus is not a latency tolerant interface. Looks like it might be dual LGPL BSD license.
• JTAG Boundary Scan Basics White Paper

This file is maintained by Mark Whitis (whitis@freelabs.com).

Senior Engineer for hire Software Development - Electronic Design - Embedded Systems - Device Drivers - System/Network Administration and Security - Motor Control, RobotCNC - Linux/Un*x - 25+ years experience The author of these pages is looking for a new gig. [RESUME]




Engineers and electronic hobbyists: The new Open Symbol Project is creating open schematic symbols and PCB footprints for a variety of different CAD packages.




Mark Whitis's Website

Home Page

Linux

Book: Linux Programming Unleashed

My Resume

Genealogical Data

Contact Info

Security

About

All email messages received must pass the turing test or they will be considered SPAM. If it could have been written by a machine, it was.

Under no circumstances are you to email me with questions regarding windoze, any other microsoft operating system or application, or any software which runs under any form of windoze.

*